11 Feb 2011
Net neutrality is bad for the enterprise because in an age of when workers are increasingly mobile, it makes it harder to secure confidential business information, according to a leading analyst.
"The internet is 10,000 service providers all providing their little bit of data and handling it between each other," said Clive Longbottom, service director, business process analyst, at Quocirca.
"Net neutrality is one of the worst things that could possibly happen if you look at it from a corporate point of view," he said.
"We need more control in the cloud and net neutrality does not give us that capability. What controls do we have? Minimal."
Longbottom said the problem was compounded by the fact that most companies still lack a coherent mobile security strategy.
"Companies often think that because they have security at rest that this means they have got full encryption. Just because your data is encrypted at rest doesn't mean that it will be encrypted on the move," he said.
"The internet is where the mobile user is likely to be coming in and he or she is likely going to use functions available in the public internet. How do we know that the user is going to touch anything to do with the organisation and the controlled environment?"
Companies should think strategically about what the cloud can offer for it to be a successful solution.
Longbottom said that although companies may be attracted by the "glitzy" options the cloud has to offer, it should be the end result that matters and this should fit with the business needs.
"This is where cloud is going to survive, thrive or fail. If it goes out there and tries to be the ultimate answer to everybody it will fail.
"If it goes out there and says there are certain things we can do better, not necessarily cheaper, but better, and this is how we fit in with scale up and scale out, then we stand a chance of it working."
Longbottom was speaking at NetEvents in Barcelona.
Net neutrality would in fact encourage more cloud takers. Cloud is not only about video streaming, but services providers for other applications.
I was surprised to read the first statement "Net neutrality is bad for the enterprise because in an age of when workers are increasingly mobile, it makes it harder to secure confidential business information, according to a leading analyst."
Net neutrality and security does not go hand in hand. Let us not "frightened" away people (non IT savvy) from adopting cloud computing.
Posted by: Yakkha 24 Mar 2011
A basic explanation of net neutrality is that all traffic should be treated equally - in terms of priority.
Now I can see reasons for traffic shaping in some situations - and I can particularly see how cloud based services would benefit from having the required network traffic prioritised.
I am at a loss to see how net neutrality affects security.
The comment "We need more control in the cloud and net neutrality does not give us that capability. What controls do we have? Minimal." makes sense from a QoS or traffic shaping perspective - how does this relate back to the security point at the start of the article?
Is this a case of further explanation being required or have some comments been taken out of context?
Posted by: withheld 11 Feb 2011
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Internet
Latest videos
You may also like
Internet jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?