IBM threatens standards bodies

Vendor demands fairer processes for the passing of technology standards

IBM believes that bodies such as the ISO can be 'gamed'

IBM has declared that it will review its membership with bodies that set standards for the technology industry.

The decision follows the acceptance of Microsoft's Open XML format by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), a recognition that IBM deems unethical.

"One event that our announcement is not entirely the outcome of, but that is difficult to overlook, is the adoption of Microsoft's OXML format," said Jonathan Sage, IBM governmental programme executive. "It proved that bodies such as the ISO can be gamed."

IBM backed the rival Open Document Format that had already been certified as an ISO standard. The company claims that Microsoft's format was only accepted because it was fast-tracked and the bodies bowed to political pressure.

Big Blue explained that it is launching a review because certain bodies carry what it described as opaque process and complicated intellectual property policies, and can be easily manipulated.

Standards are important because they allow electronic devices and software programmes to interoperate with one another, the company said.

IBM also claimed that its unmatched market share in the technology industry often makes its contributions critical to decisions made by standards bodies.

The vendor hopes its move will ensure that technology decisions and dispute resolutions are made fairly by independent participants, and that intellectual property policies become clearer and more consistent to enable more informed decision making by standards developers.

"Common, open and consensus-based technology standards from reputable standards bodies help ensure that each of us can easily purchase and interchangeably use computing technology from multiple vendors," said Bob Sutor, IBM vice president of open source and standards.

IBM expects its move to prompt the standard bodies to take action and carefully analyse their procedures, Sage added.

"If the standard bodies do not improve, they will be questioned by other members," he warned.