Domain name
The effect of the non-refundable 'tasting' fee is negligible from the domain taster's perspective

Icann tasting solution a 'partial success'

Refund plan not strong enough, says Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse

Written by Clement James

It is unlikely that Icann's new policy will completely eliminate the problem of domain tasting

Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse 

The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (Cadna) has described Icann's solution to the problem of domain 'tasting' as a "partial success".

Domain name tasting is the process by which registrants obtain a domain name and track its traffic over the course of the five-day Add Grace Period.

If it does not yield enough traffic to make it immediately profitable, the registrant drops the domain name within five days in order to get a refund of the 20 cent registration fee.

The Icann board approved a measure in January to make the 20 cent registration fee non-refundable.

The organisation voted on a further measure in June that would allow registrars refunds only up to 10 per cent of net new registrations or 50 domain names, whichever is greater.

The combined impact is that registrars will only be accountable for the non-refundable 20 cents on deletes beyond the 10 per cent threshold.

However, Cadna believes that it is unlikely that the proposed solution will adequately address domain name tasting.

The results of a Cadna study suggest that a registrant that registers 100,000 domain names would keep 6,600 of them on average.

At $6.20 each, the cost of these domain names would be $40,920. Paired with the 20 cent Icann fee for each of the 93,400 domains that were not kept, the total cost of the domains would be $59,600.

In other words, the taster would have spent $9 per profitable domain name that was identified via tasting and kept beyond the Add Grace Period.

The 20 cents that the registrant wasted on the names that were not worth keeping would be easily covered by the ample profit from the good names they identified through tasting.

The additional new cost per domain name would be $2.80. Since each click is worth 73 cents on average to a 'traffic-squatter' each domain name would need to receive just an additional 3.8 clicks in year one in order to make up the difference from the "inconvenient" Icann fee, the organisation said.

Cadna reckons that before the proposed Icann tariff on all added domains, a name needed to demonstrate that it could deliver 8.5 clicks per year.

With the Icann fee, a name needs to demonstrate that it can deliver 12.3 clicks per year in year one.

With so few paid-search ad clicks needed to break even either before or after Icann's 20 cent solution, the effect of the non-refundable fee is negligible from the domain taster's perspective.

"Unfortunately, it is therefore unlikely that Icann's new registration fee policy will completely eliminate the problem of domain tasting," Cadna said.

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print this
  • Share

reader comments

related articles

IcannGovernment

Turkish hackers crack Icann

NetDevilz strikes again 28 Jun 2008

 

Icann promises new web boom

New domains will create 'unprecedented growth' 28 Jun 2008

Icann approves generic domains

Green light for new top-level rules 27 Jun 2008

Icann vows to kill domain 'tasting'

Grace period being exploited, claims registry 31 Jan 2008

Icann approves internationalised domain names

IDNs could be in use by early next year 30 Oct 2009

related white papers

today's top stories

Copyright agreement draft leaked again

ACTA workings published after Washington DC negotiating round 07 Sep 2010

Lloyd's Of London takes Facebook to the board

Peter Hambling, CIO of Lloyd’s of London, the venerable insurer, has made Facebook a priority for customer communications that required board approval.... 07 Sep 2010

Genuinely intuitive technology is years away

If the aim of technology is to simplify our lives, then it has failed 07 Sep 2010

Samsung P580 business laptop review

Not the most attractive business machine, but it's robust and performs well 06 Sep 2010

NAO urged to investigate £550m NPfIT contract

MP suspects BT deal represents very poor value for money 06 Sep 2010

Advertisement

Best practices to secure and protect backup data
Exploding the myths about data security and backup encryption

Using data integration to drive down costs and increase profits
This paper outlines why data integration is an important weapon in an enterprise’s competitive arsenal

Advertisement

Citrix

Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies; IThound.com brings you thousands of white papers, case studies and analyst reports.

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

More available - click 'submit' to view

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Jobs

Related jobs

Job of the week

Job alerts

Sign up here

Find your next job

IT Salary Checker

Check salary here

Advertisement

Latest poll

The Chinese Market

The Chinese Market

Is your company considering expansion into the Chinese market?

View poll results

Latest audio and video articles

A microphoneAudio

Computing Podcast: Tech Talk episode 5

Join Tech Talk for an overview of the week's top IT stories, and a debate on IT self-service. Will it provide value? 27 Aug 2010

A microphoneAudio

Computing podcast: Tech Talk episode 4

Join Tech Talk for an overview of the week's top IT stories, and a debate on IT skills. Is the UK slipping behind? 20 Aug 2010

Latest in-depth articles

ShanghaiAnalysis

How tech companies can crack China

Having a good product will only get you so far, as Rachel Fielding explains 07 Sep 2010

HandshakeFeatures

The pros and cons of output-based contracting

Proponents of output-based contracting say it enables more efficient service delivery, innovation and an improved customer experience. But it needs to be approached with care 07 Sep 2010

Primary Navigation