03 May 2007, Sarah Arnott and Tom Young, Computing
http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/1853804/industry-clean-act
Technology accounts for two per cent of all carbon emissions, putting the industry on a par with the aviation sector, says analyst Gartner.
But experts say IT also has more potential for speedy improvement than industries such as transport and manufacturing.
The two per cent figure includes both computer usage and the energy used to design, manufacture and distribute products.
Gartner researcher Simon Mingay says that the figure is a conservative estimate.
‘We included an approximation of the energy used in IT production, but we underestimated quite a lot so the actual number is probably higher,’ said Mingay.
‘The good news is that it is an area with huge potential for improvement,’ he added.
The fast pace of IT change means greener features, such as power management, can be quickly incorporated into products. And simple best practice, such as turning off monitors at night, has an immediate impact.
Many issues need tackling to cut carbon emissions, but IT is a good place to start, says MP Michael Jack, chairman of the House of Commons Environment Committee.
‘The speed of technological developments means issues around the waste of electrical power can be removed from IT without the angst currently typifying efforts to remove emissions from aviation,’ Jack told Computing.
Business has a further role to play in putting pressure on technology suppliers.
Most large firms have green policies, but IT vendors need to do more, says David Roberts, chief executive of user group The Corporate IT Forum.
‘There are some quick wins that would immediately allow users to reduce carbon emissions – provided suppliers do not stand in the way,’ he said.
Roberts says some vendors are taking advantage of technology that can do three times the work by charging three times the licence costs. ‘That is bad for users, bad for innovation and bad for the environment,’ he said.
There is a danger the world’s insatiable appetite for technology will counteract progress, says Friends of the Earth climate change campaigner Martin Williams.
‘If a PC becomes twice as efficient, but there are four times as many of them, then we have not got anywhere,’ he said.
Reader comments
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093
Monitors Will Not Save the World
I read with some disbelief your article "Industry Must Clean Up Its Act" (3 May 2007). While I do not dispute that large amounts of energy are needlessly wasted by equipment being left on and poor power management, statements such as "turning off monitors at night has an immediate effect" are quite simply not true.
Having recently tested our IT equipment, I can confirm that our TFT monitors draw less than 1W of energy when on standby. Compare this to the 100W which a lightbulb uses (or even the 22W of an energy efficient bulb) and it becomes clear that turning lights off when out at lunch can have a far more significant effect than turning the monitor off overnight.
Furthermore, since some models of monitor have small power adapters on them, turning them off on the front actually achieves nothing; it would be necessary to turn them off at the wall before any effect were noticed.
Posted by: Nick Jones 08 May 2007
Leicester?
I would like clarification regarding this article and the comment that an average data centre had the same carbon footprint as Leicester. Statistics can say an awful lot but they can also mislead if not represented correctly. So does the average data centre statistic as apposed to Leicester include the stats for car/transport, waste, household heating and electricity emissions? Surely not otherwise these data centres would need there own power stations. Can anyone help?
Posted by: S Cumming 10 May 2007