Logo
Print this page
Save to disk

Intelligence agencies ignore security powers

31 Jul 2008, Tom Young, Computing

http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/1838482/intelligence-agencies-ignore-security-powers

GCHQ
GCHQ has not yet forced firms to hand over encryption keys

A controversial law that requires encryption keys to be handed over to authorities has not been used by any of the three main intelligence agencies.

Part III of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act came into force in October 2007 and gives authorities the power to require firms to hand over encryption keys.

But a report from the Intelligence Services Commissioner ­ who oversees the work of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ ­ said: “There has been no exercise or performance of powers and duties under Part III for me to review.”

Businesses raised concerns over the government’s poor track record of keeping valuable information, resulting in safeguards which may have made the law difficult to enforce, said Peter Sommer, security expert at the London School of Economics.

“The code of practice took a long time to agree and there are now a lot of hoops that have to be jumped through,” said Sommer.

Following the pressure from business, the government wanted to ensure law enforcement agencies could only access relevant information.

Drafting the law and introducing a workable code of practice was difficult because it needed to apply to home and business-based technology.

Approval for a Section 49 notice ­ the requirement to hand over an encryption key ­ can only be given by senior officers, and they can be appealed.

Notices can be served by police as well as the intelligence services.

Last November animal rights campaigners became the first to be hit with Section 49 notices by the Crown Prosecution Service, and faced two years in prison if they failed to comply.

Reader comments

RIPA difficult to enforce?

Tom Young seems to say I am suggesting RIPA Part III, the decryption power, is difficult to enforce. What I actually said (and this reflects the actual quote) is that the authorities have to demonstrate necessity and proportionality in seeking the power to compel decryption. There are two likely reasons why the agencies have yet to make much use: first, the Code of Practice has not been in force very long. Second, there is a risk of tipping off a suspect.

Posted by: Peter Sommer  04 Aug 2008

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093