Logo
Print this page
Save to disk

Best practice – How to reap the benefits of unified communications

30 Oct 2008, Phil Sayer, principal analyst, Forrester Research, Computing

http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/feature/1828404/best-practice-how-reap-benefits-unified-communications

Is unified communications (UC) vendor hype or essential business tool? Enterprise pilots are now almost universal – CIOs tell Forrester that UC is a top IT priority, and only 13% of enterprises recently surveyed had no plans for UC. But vendor proliferation, confusion about standards and problems with business case development are all major barriers. We suggest five principles to help enterprises navigate through this mire:

Develop a strategic plan for Unified Communications (UC) as part of an IT strategic plan. Every CIO needs an IT strategic plan to set business expectations, establish credibility with the firm's executive management and bring coherence across IT. Without a strategic plan, IT is at a greater risk of failing simply because the myriad of decisions made across the organisation and over time will not have common goals or agreed paths to these goals. This creates an organisational ambiguity that feeds a "workaround" culture. UC is a now a core part of IT – along with collaboration and information management. If you don’t have an enterprise-wide plan for UC, you will end up with dead-end silos and waste money.

Build a business case based on cost savings. Productivity gains are nice to have, but in today’s challenging economic times, your finance director is only interested in how IT can save money. IP telephony will reduce operating costs, and built in voice conferencing facilities will cut your conference bridge bill. Video conferencing will help you reduce your travel bill, and UC features like softphones will enable people to work at home when they need to.

Involve business leaders in decisions and vendor selection. Because UC feeds collaboration, business leaders take an impassioned interest in UC and its impact on the productivity and success of their teams. Today, business unit leaders are taking a more active and powerful role in the selection of UC solutions, with 58% of UC decisions being heavily influenced by the business buyer. This trend can only increase, so work with business leaders who can champion the use of the technology. UC vendors will have to adjust their selling strategies to address this new buyer group. UC integration with business applications, such as the joint development between SAP and Microsoft or IBM, will drive the business value for UC deep into the business.

Bring in outside professional help to help you design the UC and collaboration architecture. System Integrators will be well positioned to win many UC deals because they have the relationships and skills that many other industry participants do not — and they have a deep understanding of industry business processes where UC and collaboration will have the biggest impact. Systems integrators have relationships in place with business executives and can interact with those business leaders as strategic advisors. UC and Collaboration software can help you to innovate by changing and streamlining business processes – this is what you need to focus on, not easier to use voice and video.

Leverage your existing vendor partnerships. When money is tight, a phased migration plan is not just good sense, it is the only practical way forward. If your existing desktop vendor is Microsoft, then Office Communications Server is probably right for you, if IBM then take a good look at IBM’s Lotus Sametime. The differences between vendor functionality will not justify a move. If you have a dominant PBX vendor, migrate to their IP voice solution – this choice will maximise the continued use of existing equipment until you need to replace it. They are all working hard on interworking with both Microsoft and IBM. Polycom and Tandberg have great interworking capability with older videoconferencing systems; leverage your existing installed base. Adopt an open standards-based strategy – no one vendor is best at everything, and this approach will enable you to keep your plan flexible.

Reader comments

Couldn't agree more

Well, done. I couldn't agree more,especially the advice to stick with your current vendor. This software has been around for so long, all of the vendors provide the same thing. see my post on http://iconax.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Clive Keyte  31 Oct 2008

Cost savings v's business performance

Aren't you missing one of the fundamental positives of UC by suggesting that IT Professionals build a business case based on just cost savings? UC is all about increasing productivity and surely in the current climate that shouldn't be ignored? Some research is showing that organisations that have rolled out UC are seeing a 7% rise in income as a direct result due to better internal and external communications.

Posted by: Mike England, Event Director, Unified Communications Expo  31 Oct 2008

Posted response from Dave Hardcastle, Technical Director, Redstone Converged Solutions

UC is more than an enabler to reduce cost, it's an enabler for business competitive advantage. UC should be viewed as a core strategic asset at the very foundation of a company's business improvements. It should be viewed as something a CIO must have to ensure that a company is perceived in the best possible way, a bit like a shop window to the outside world. UC is more than an investment it's a necessity for a modern day business.

UC requires a large capital outlay, not just in the telephony application purchase and its deployment but also in the LAN and WAN infrastructure in terms of power and quality of service provision.
To attain a ROI in today's poor economic climate where expectations are less than 12 months is a difficult task, especially with the cost of minutes decreasing within today's large competitive landscape.
UC will enable tangible cost savings to be made, but the driver has to be how an organisation can compete in a marketplace where its direct competition will be benefiting from the use of UC, thereby increasing its staff productivity, its business efficiency and its client acquisition and retention.

I would agree that where possible a company should add new technology to its existing infrastructure with flexible options such as lease financing to create enhanced results. There is no point investing in technology that is at a dead end, UC is far more than a TDM IP enabled PBX, it's the applications, the integration and the optimisation that will yield the greatest business benefits. For internal users, that means productivity gains and cost reductions, for their clients its improvements in personal customer interaction, enhanced collaboration and an increase in professionalism. In essence it's the ability for any UC driven organisation to achieve more within the same given timeframe, be it improved accuracy, increased productivity or enhanced efficiency wherever their location and whatever their communications links may be.

Posted by: Dave Hardcastle  04 Nov 2008

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093