David Neal
David Neal

Domain name and shame

The web's plethora of domain extensions can lead to embarrassment

Written by David Neal

Can you spot the difference between the following two URLs: preparingforemergencies.co.uk and preparingforemergencies.gov.uk?

That's right, one has a .gov.uk suffix, the other a .co.uk. To the uninitiated that probably means little, but more savvy internet users will know that the former is an official government URL, which can only be registered by the chaps from Westminster, while the other - a .co.uk domain - could easily be registered by anyone, from the government itself to a bored student. Which, indeed, it was.

The .co.uk site is a spoof. Admittedly, it would be a lot more obvious as a spoof if the address were www.funnyjokelaughtershow.com/spoof/government/preparingforemergencies, but it's not. Instead it bears all the hallmarks of the real McCoyð an unfortunate embarrassment for the government.

It does include clues that it is jokey, such as this advice: "If you are involved in any emergency it is important to: Run like hell, particularly if you caused the emergency. Trample all others in your desperate attempt to escape. Loot on the way out." But in a country in which Robson and Jerome can sell a million records we cannot underestimate the intelligence of the population, many of whom are undoubtedly looking forward to upgrading their television sets before the long dark nuclear winter.

Of course the government should have seized all variants of its new domain as soon as someone sitting around the board table suggested the project and someone else went, "by Jove I think he's got it". Instead it saved a few quid and stuck with the easily recognisable government domain. But there lies the rub. It's easily recognisable to you and I, but it could confuse a lot of people.

There are myriad domain extensions that the government could have registered, including the aforementioned .co.uk and others such as .info ð the domain reserved for disseminating information, which is undoubtedly the aim of the site in question. So it is unfair to brandish the stupid stick only in the direction of the general populace who know enough about the internet to at least put .co.uk on the end of a UK internet address.

Like the government, firms have a couple of choices to make when coming up with a new domain name. First they have to find a new name to register, and second they have to decide where to register it. The government got the first part right ð it ignored my suggestion of www.panicstations.gov.uk ð and chose a title that would appeal to the marketing bods at Ronseal, but it failed in the second instance.

The vagaries of the online ranking system mean the spoof version has a higher place on Google than the official one, so in the split second after the bomb and before the power goes out, hapless internet users looking for help will be told they should: "Try to remain calm and try to reassure others. Or, trample them in a desperate attempt to flee as the building you're in is consumed by a radioactive cloud."

This is not ideal, and although by the time the nukes fall it will be too late for their customers, firms do still have time to learn from the government's mistake.

When registering a domain it pays to cast your net wide.

Tags:

reader comments

related articles

 

related whitepapers

today's top stories

What does Windows 7 mean for Microsoft?

With the sting of Vista still fresh, Redmond has to make next Windows work 10 Jul 2009

A smarter way to use BI

Getting the most from business intelligence systems requires not only careful management on the part of IT leaders, but also the committed involvement of decision-makers across the organisation 08 Jul 2009

The truth behind the Google/Microsoft/NHS rumours

Before Monday 6 July, did you know that Google and Microsoft had services for storing health records? Thanks to an article in... 10 Jul 2009

Quenching a thirst for IT modernisation

A substantial restructure at soft drink supplier Nichols -­ purveyor of Vimto - ­led the company to update its software to Sage 1000 to replace its in-house application. This resulted in the streamlining of the IT department and an opportunity to customise the system 08 Jul 2009

How Satyam cleaned up its act

Chief executive CP Gurnani tells Angelica Mari why Tech Mahindra opted to keep the Satyam brand after it bought the scandal-hit services firm, and explains what the deal means for existing and prospective customers 09 Jul 2009

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

More available - click 'submit' to view

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Advertisement

Jobs

Related jobs

Job of the week

Job alerts

Sign up here

Find your next job

IT Salary Checker

Check salary here

Advertisement

White papers

Search white papers

Top categories

VPN, Extranet and Intranet Solutions

WAN/ LAN Solutions

Network Security

Interoperability-Connectivity

Grid/ Utility Computing

Latest poll

Will Google Chrome OS be a genuine alternative to Windows?

Will Google Chrome OS be a genuine alternative to Windows?

Tell us your views on the new operating system rivalry

View poll results

Latest audio and video articles

network cablesVideo

How to maximise the value of your IT networking investment

A panel of experts discuss networking strategies that deliver real value to business 03 Jul 2009

green footprintsVideo

How to manage enterprise energy use - and the role IT can play

A panel of experts explore how firms can get to grips with their carbon footprint and make smarter use of energy 01 Jul 2009

Latest in-depth articles

Google ChromeAnalysis

Lack of enterprise appeal takes shine off Chrome OS

Enterprise buyers unlikely to ditch Windows for Chrome OS in the near term, say experts 09 Jul 2009

Satyam CEO CP GurnaniNews

How Satyam cleaned up its act

Chief executive CP Gurnani tells Angelica Mari why Tech Mahindra opted to keep the Satyam brand after it bought the scandal-hit services firm, and explains what the deal means for existing and prospective customers 09 Jul 2009

Advertisement

Primary Navigation