08 Jul 2010
When chess champion Gary Kasparov was defeated by the Deep Blue computer in 1997, he and the chess world were outraged.
Sound bites included: "Something strange is going on”, “It didn’t play a regular game of chess”, “It didn’t play like a human” and “It didn’t play fair”.
But no one asked the most important question – how did it win?
The key here was a new intelligence had entered the game: a powerful computer that didn’t think like us. And nor should it, because it was bringing a new dimension and a new way of solving the problem.
Between the years 1975 and 1995 all the technologies of visualisation that we enjoy today were in their infancy. Electronic displays, Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AVR) and 3D all existed, but all were basic, big, power hungry, expensive and the preserve of large laboratories.
Since 1995 technology advances have seen huge improvements in resolution, fidelity, sensitivity, power consumption, size, weight, and dramatic reductions in cost.
In addition, computing power and memory have grown exponentially, with optical fibre and wireless connectivity seemingly becoming ubiquitous. There has also been a realisation that networking is a primary mechanism for collaboration.
Further developments of note are those in humanoid and non-humanoid robotics, telepresence, artificial life, modelling and games, 3D replicators, nano-structures, bio-manipulation and design, plus of course the rise in machine-based intelligence.
Today we are constantly surprised by AI systems and the answers they contrive, and on many occasions we lack the facility to fully understand. But that does not preclude us using the results. We have gradually realised that the solution of many industrial, scientific and governmental problems will continue to defy human abilities. So the question is, could AI provide further and significant enhancements to the world of visualisation?
Sensors have largely been neglected as components of intelligence thus far, but they are fundamental to the intelligence of anything. Interestingly, sophisticated sensors have only recently emerged as ‘key capability’ components in robotics, and control systems.
With the arrival of a myriad of sensor components and their rapid deployment on the periphery of networks, the internet, robotics, large and small systems, we are much closer to creating true artificial intelligence than ever before.
When combined with our existing and established approaches to visualisation it could result in significant advance in the way we view, experience, and react to complex situations.
Interestingly, this will also see a marked change in the way our systems react to us. So if this is only a matter of when, and not what if, there is only one question left to ask: will we be smart enough to recognise a new intelligence when it spontaneously erupts on the internet or within some other complex system we build?
Peter Cochrane is an engineer, scientist, entrepreneur, futurist and consultant. He is the former CTO and Head of Research at BT, with a career in telecoms and IT spanning over 40 years.
"Imagine the "wisdom" such a system could distill from the scientific and cultural output of millions of lifetimes."
Imagine all the propaganda and misinformation it would come across as well... and satire, which it wouldn't necessarily be able to comprehend, or wild exaggeration or overblown conspiracy, or any number of things it would have difficulty understanding. There would be lots of information gleaned, but very little 'wisdom'.
Posted by: Phoenix 18 Nov 2010
DARPA, Google, IBM, Intel, HP, NASA and many others are all working lockstep in building 'Skynet'. There is absolutely no debate or refutation to this hardcore fact. Meanwhile there's little to no public discussion or debate over the implication of this. Now is the time.
http://ignoranceisfutile.wordpress.com/
Posted by: IIB 10 Jul 2010
Hi Peter,
Don't AI breakthroughs happen all the time? You describe such systems evolving slowly.
Sensors are certain to be part of the future AI systems' senses, but are the eyes, ears etc intelligent?
Surely the holy grail is natural language processing. A sufficiently powerful machine or bot that could understand and interpret written text would be able to read every word on the internet almost instantly. Why would this system require sensors?
Imagine the "wisdom" such a system could distill from the scientific and cultural output of millions of lifetimes.
We might notice when this happens, but it will probably only be a small headline on a sci/tech industry website, or the amusing story at the end of the news. Most people won't notice because such systems evolve slowly compared to society's acceptance of new technology.
Posted by: Brian 09 Jul 2010
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Developer
Latest videos
You may also like
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?