How to fashion a winning IT team

05 Nov 2009

Comments: 3

A Computing logo
Graham Benson

Leadership-logoDuring the first incarnation of the internet and up to the 2001 dotbomb, the media depicted a certain type of dot commer, illustrated best by programmes such as the BBC’s Attachments. These IT staff were young, fashionable, driven mavericks. They also operated in the business equivalent of dog years ­- that is, they would squeeze seven years into one.

That was a fairly accurate assessment in my experience, but things have changed. The web as a channel has matured since 2001, and this has been further accelerated by the Web 2.0 environment. The result is that many online businesses have changed their expectations of what constitutes good IT.

IT leaders are now expected to take fewer risks, be more grown up and less radical, while retaining some creativity, pace and entrepreneurial spirit.

So what are the key requirements of today’s internet IT team? Or come to that, any high-growth small business? There are many, but in the interests of brevity I will highlight just one example from each of the three drivers for change: process, people and systems.

Process: know your organisational maturity level and match your IT maturity to it

Organisational maturity is a measure of the level of discipline, rigor and process within any business. At one end of the spectrum is the anarchic, chaotic, creative and often dictatorial organisation that flies by the seat of its pants. At the other is a business so involved in process and bureaucracy that it takes six months, five signatures and three steering groups to issue a new pencil.

It is important to understand where your business fits on this scale, and match the maturity of the IT department to the rest of the business.

If you want your IT department to be less radical and more grown up, you wil l need to move the maturity level of the business concurrently. The IT department will only be successful if it is aligned.

People: balance analysts and entrepreneurs

High-intensity IT demands generated by rapidly growing organisations require an IT director to assemble a team with the right psychological composition. Maintenance specialists do the same things over and over again, analytical types look to do the same things differently, while entrepreneurs do different things.

All three approaches are valid at certain times but need to be balanced to achieve the right mix of change and continuity. The number required of each employee type will vary according to the business requirements and how “IT mature” the business is.

My advice would be to recruit your key intellectual property (entrepreneurs) from inside, use a mixture of sources for your analytical capability ­ by combining a core permanent team with temporary staff during times of high demand ­ and outsource commoditised maintenance wherever it makes sense.

Systems: avoid the seduction of new systems

New systems can be traps for unwary IT directors. There are several reasons why an otherwise sound individual might replace a legacy system without robust justification. These include technical snobbery ­ the IT director might want to seem new and current; technical vanity ­ the IT director will certainly want other people to think he knows his stuff; and finally the IT director might believe that skills pertaining to an old system are difficult to come by.

If snobbery is an issue, the director should give the technology a makeover with web services or a service-oriented architecture. If it’s vanity, the director should hire an expert to prove that he is a great delegator. And if you cannot find the staff, or the technology is obsolete, there are a multitude of IT service companies who will help resolve the problem.

Joking aside, when presenting a business case to a board for approval, the IT director needs to be aware of his own motivations and ensure that the justifications put forward to support the proposed investment are sound and well informed. He must be certain that he hasn’t fallen into any of these traps.

Graham Benson is IT director at online fashion retailer M&M Direct

Pdf-logoIBM White Paper download
Learn how Web 2.0 technology - adapted for business - can help firms pool resources both inside and outside the organisation

Reader comments

Shouldn't IT Lead Innovation?

Graham makes some interesting points regarding the composition of the IT team, but seems to position IT in a business support role.

What of IT's role in leading business innovation?

Which other area of an organisation has such a wide understanding of business processes, manages change on a daily basis and is in such a unique position to deliver innovation?

This potential for innovation will only be realised when a) IT is seen as an integral part of business development and, b) more entrepreneurial IT Directors emerge to lead the way.

Posted by: Graham Perry  06 Nov 2009

Practice these strategies

Some good points made here. If you want more experience in managing an IT department...try playing: IT Manager III: Unseen Forces. See if you can become one of the best! http://itmanager3.intel.com/en-gb/default.aspx?iid=ITMG_IgniteSeed_UK_Computing

Posted by: MelissaDigitalis  05 Nov 2009

Bridge the gap between IT and the business

Small IT departments of mid-market and SME organisations could be unknowingly jeopardising the business through a lack of understanding and insight. A key requirement for any organisation is to bridge the gap between IT and the business to ensure it fully understands the strategic objectives. It is only by doing this can it go the extra mile to deliver as the business grows.

In part, the problem is one of culture. More often than not IT Directors in mid-market and SME businesses are long term employees who have progressed to senior status through longevity and loyalty. It is highly unlikely that the organisation has provided the support for this individual to have the resources, time or expertise to assess business risk or undertake strategic planning and long term IT budgeting.

In this fast changing technology environment in-house skills rapidly become out-of-date without continual investment in new technology. Consequently, businesses probably end up with an individual who may not have the strategic skills nor the breadth of talents needed to manage today's complex network and application infrastructure.

It is only by taking a step back, assessing and understanding the current levels of risk associated with existing IT deployments, that an organisation can truly determine its ongoing IT requirements. It can then put in place the technology, skills and resources to reduce operational risk and bridge that gap between IT and the business to transform IT from a cost centre to business enabler.

Posted by: Mitesh Patel, Managing Director, Fifosys, www.fifosys.com  05 Nov 2009

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %