Usability guru Jakob Nielsen has slammed Microsoft's new Windows 8 operating system, accusing the company of hiding everyday features, imposing a tablet paradigm on desktop users, as well as a single-window user interface instead of enabling users to set-up their desktop "estate" in the way that they want to.
"With the recent launch of Windows 8 and the Surface tablets, Microsoft has reversed its user interface strategy. From a traditional Gates-driven GUI style that emphasised powerful commands to the point of featuritis, Microsoft has gone soft and now smothers usability with big colorful tiles while hiding needed features," wrote Nielsen in his blog.
He adds: "The product shows two faces to the user: a tablet-oriented 'Start' screen and a PC-oriented desktop screen. Unfortunately, having two environments on a single device is a prescription for usability problems for several reasons.
He reserved his most stinging criticism for the operating system's inability to display more than one window at a time – a throwback to the early Windows operating systems of the mid-1980s and early 1990s. Indeed, it was only with Windows 7 that Microsoft finally offered such features as gestures enabling two windows, such as a browser and a Libre Office document – to be opened side-by-side.
"The product ought to be renamed 'Microsoft Window'," wrote Nielsen.
That feature shortcoming makes it difficult for users to consume and use information.
"When users can't view several windows simultaneously, they must keep information from one window in short-term memory while they activate another window. This is problematic for two reasons. First, human short-term memory is notoriously weak and second, the very task of having to manipulate a window – instead of simply glancing at one that's already open – further taxes the user's cognitive resources."
[Please turn to page two]
This paper seeks to provide education and technical insight to beacons, in addition to providing insight to Apple's iBeacon specification
Focus on cost efficiency, simplicity, performance, scalability and future-readiness when architecting your data protection strategy