StreetView review finds Google has upped its privacy game

By Gareth Morgan

16 Aug 2011

Comments: 2

Google Streetview Red Car

Google has received an all-clear from the UK’s Information Commissioner, after a recent audit at the search giant demonstrated it had taken "reasonable” steps to improve privacy practices in the wake of the Wi-Fi sniffing fiasco.

The audit, which took place in Google’s London offices on 19 and 20 July 2011, was part of the settlement reached between the ICO and Google last November.

Further reading

“I’m satisfied that Google has made good progress in improving its privacy procedures following the undertaking they signed with me last year,” said Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner.

But he added that Google had to maintain a robust approach to safeguarding the data it collects on people in future.

“The ICO’s Google audit is not a rubber stamp for the company’s data protection policies. The company needs to ensure its work in this area continues to evolve alongside new products and technologies,” said Graham. “Google will not be filed and forgotten by the ICO.”

The ICO initially investigated Google after receiving complaints about Google’s StreetView project. It emerged that as well as collecting photographs of British roads, its StreetMap vehicles were also collecting payload data from unsecured Wi-FI hotspots.

Google has firmly maintained that this was a result of over-enthusiastic engineers giving its vehicles capabilities they hadn’t needed, rather than a deliberate attempt to snaffle home owners’ Wi-Fi traffic.

Google agreed to delete the data as part of its settlement with the ICO made in November 2010.

The ICO has now said Google still has to improve its process for building privacy safeguards into its project planning.

Reader comments

Agree

I agree with Brian on this. It's the fault of the owners, not Google.

Posted by: Conor Spencer  28 Oct 2011

WiFi

I have never understood all the fuss about the so called "wifi sniffing" Google did. If people leave their network ID on broadcast what do they expect? That is exactly what it's for, to make people aware of the location of the network. If they additionally fail to have any security, they are not only publicly broadcasting the location, but also offering it for use.
I was under the impression that this is what was originally intended.
It's all a fuss about nothing, brought about by dozy users too stupid to read the instructions, just setting up routers etc. "out of the box".

Posted by: Brian Jones  16 Aug 2011

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %