ICO fines Surrey County Council £120,000

By Stuart Sumner

10 Jun 2011

Comment: 1

ICO's Christopher Graham

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has fined Surrey County Council £120,000 for three serious breaches of the Data Protection Act over the last year.

Information commissioner Christopher Graham (pictured) said that the fine was reflective of the serious nature of the initial breach, and the fact that it was followed by two more breaches.

Further reading

"This significant penalty fully reflects the seriousness of the case," he said.

"The fact that the first breach saw sensitive personal information relating to the health and welfare of 241 vulnerable individuals was sent to the wrong people is shocking enough. But when you take into account the two similar breaches that followed, it is clear that Surrey County Council failed to fully address the risks of sending sensitive personal data by email until it was far too late."

The most serious breach occurred in May last year, when a council worker accidentally emailed the personal health records of 241 individuals to the wrong group address.

This was followed by two similar breaches in July last year and in January this year.

Graham said: "Any organisation handling sensitive information must have appropriate levels of security in place. Surrey County Council has paid the price for their failings, and this case should act as a warning to others that lax data protection practices will not be tolerated."

The ICO has been criticised in the past for a perceived reluctance to use its powers to fine, but a spokesman claimed that today's announcement does not reflect a move towards financial penalties.

"Punitive measures are decided on a case-by-case basis," he said. "We have to look at the sensitivity of the information, whether the organisation in question did enough to prevent the breach, and the ability of the organisation to pay. Every organisation and every data breach is different."

Once paid, the fine will be passed on to HM Treasury's Consolidated Fund.

Reader comments

Council employees

My experience of the Surrey County Council is that they are quick to hide behind the Data Protection Act when there is no need. Perhaps this fine will be taken into consideration when the cuts in staff are needed to save money.
I wonder what the Chief Executive is paid?

Posted by: Peter Tuppen  09 Jul 2011

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %