Open source vendors unfairly excluded from government contracts

By Gareth Morgan

08 Jun 2011

Comments: 2

Concept artwork showing Open Source Technology Platform in a Community

European public sector IT contracts are unfairly favouring large suppliers such as Microsoft by ignoring the rules governing the use of trademarks in tender requests, according to a new report.

Campaign group OpenForum Europe has analysed more than 400 IT-related tender notices posted to the Official Journal of the EU between February and March 2010.

Further reading

It found that more than one in 10 notices included the use of trademarks within the technical specifications, thereby restricting the firms that could bid for the work.

Where tenders were found to include trademarks, the overwhelming majority mentioned ones belonging to Microsoft.

Bertrand Diard, chief executive of open-source data management vendor Talend, called on the UK government to enforce best practice and to encourage fair competition for UK public sector contracts.

“The current process of IT contract tender [in Europe] is rife with issues,” he said. “If there is to be any development for open standards in the UK, then responsibility falls upon the shoulders of those in the Cabinet Office to follow through on their initial plans.”

Under EU rules, public sector bodies should avoid using trademarks in tender notices for software packages and information systems, in order to encourage competition.

In the wake of its long-running anti-trust dispute with Microsoft, EU officials had be keen to encourage public sector organisations to consider alternatives to Microsoft’s technology, particularly in areas where the Redmond-based firm dominated the market, such as desktop operating systems and productivity tools.

Public sector firms should include the expression “or equivalent” in tender documents where trademarked software is mentioned under the current tendering rules.

But it is clear that “government agencies are still negotiating procedures with one preferred supplier without competition,” added Diard.

Despite the prevalence of trademarks in tender documents, the trend is falling. Similar research in 2008 and 2009 found that the use of trademarks was far more widespread in IT tenders.

Reader comments

Unfair on Open Source?

Yeah, and the rest.
I've worked on the edge of some local authority schemes, council based projects and the like, and it seems to me that who you know has always been more of a deal clincher than how good the product or its price are. And yes, the article is right about Open Source too, but that's only because the boss's friend already knows about MS products so when he gets the job based on "a totally fair tender process", and based on the fact that he helped compile the tender scope in the first place, no wonder Open Source is humped before the starting pistol is fired!

Posted by: Fat Pop Do Wop  10 Jun 2011

whats the difference

regardless of whether they use trademarks or not.. they are locked in to MS.. so at the end of the day.. you can bid all you want.. they are going to drive the procurement to MS products.. isn't lockin grand..

Posted by: Pete  09 Jun 2011

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %