28 Feb 2011
The government reaffirmed its commitment to open source at a system integrators forum held by the Cabinet Office late last week, but many experts believe the public sector is still too wary of using non-proprietary software.
After attending the event, open source system integrator Sirius wrote in a blog that the government is pushing open source software in the public sector.
"The message of the day was simple, and delivered with panache by deputy government CIO Bill McCluggage," said the Sirius blog.
"The message was 'We want you to give us open source software, in fact we insist!'."
Analyst for Ovum Laurent Lachal said that apparent enthusiasm for open source is not new, but that uptake remains slow.
"This is an ongoing saga, and because the government wants to save money it will continue this way," said Lachal.
"However, this is a game and there is a lot of politics involved. The reality is that things are very slow. This is due to a lack of government understanding of open source, a lack of skill on their part, as well as entrenched relationships with specific vendors," he added.
"It is however good to remind the world that the UK is going in the right direction. France and Germany are miles ahead in open source uptake, and we need to show that we aren't averse to it."
Tom Cahill, vice president of EMEA sales for open source software vendor Jaspersoft, concurred, saying the UK still has a phobia about the word 'open'.
"The government needs not to be locked into contracts with legacy propriety software vendors, as this compromises free decision making and will slow uptake," said Cahill.
"However, it isn't doing enough to promote open source. The public sector needs to be less scared of the word ‘open'," he added.
"We don't see this on the Continent, and the reason is that in English the word open translates into ease of access, and implies lack of security. This isn't true of similar words in French or German.
"But with open source it isn't the security that is open, it is just the code".
Lachal said the government needs to work more closely with open source developers.
"The government needs to interact more with the open source community, it should make more effort, and vendors need to have a focus," said Lachal.
"Government should actually appoint somebody to champion open source and they should be clear by producing standards so that everybody knows where they stand.
"The question is no longer is open source ready for the public sector, but is the public sector ready for open source?"
In more than 30 years of working in Public Sector ICT I can count on one hand the number of people I've met who actually did think what these people say we think.
There's usually an implicit assumption that the main target for cost savings should be generic desktop and server software, for which there may be acceptable Open Source alternatives that we are perversely rejecting.
Actually this is not the bulk of Public Sector ICT spend. The real costs are in line of business applications. When the Open Source movement produces credible solutions for paying benefits, administering social care, managing road maintenance, and collecting taxes, I will welcome them with open arms. Until then I'm forced to buy commercial software and to run it on the platforms the vendors support.
I have no bargaining power because the vendors know we have to have these niche solutions whether they are open source or standards-compliant or not. We have a legal obligation to deliver the services. When the eGIF was introduced did vendors adopt open interoperability standards, just because we issued specifications saying they should? Of course not. As one vendor said to me: Sure, we'll re-engineer our solution to be compliant - if you pay us to do it.
The UK Public Sector is no worse than any other sector when it comes to using open source. If it's so much cheaper, why isn't the Private Sector falling over itself to adopt it? Surely the Bottom Line is their driving incentive?
The truth is that both Public and Private Sectors do use open source, but the same way they use other technologies: tactically, with one eye on business need and the other on total cost of ownership. And sitting somewhere between them is value for money.
Posted by: Derek B. 28 Feb 2011
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Government
Latest videos
You may also like
Government jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?