25 Feb 2011
SAP has appealed against the whopping $1.3bn (£808m) damages a jury told it to pay Oracle and asked for a new trial in the long-running intellectual property-theft spat between the two software giants.
In a filing made in the US District Court of Northern California, SAP says the payout awarded on 23 November last year is unfair and should be limited to $408.7m, the amount initially estimated by Oracle's analysts.
Further reading
Separately, Oracle has said it will "vigorously oppose" any moves to retry the case and – naturally – says the jury's verdict should stand.
The case dates back to March 2007 when Oracle sued SAP, alleging TomorrowNow, an SAP off-shoot, downloaded Oracle software and support materials illegally.
SAP accepted liability and Oracle's expert witness pegged damages at $408.7m. But the jury based its award on the assumption that SAP would have paid the full value of Oracle licences to download the IP legally.
SAP contends that it would never have sought to purchase the software and thus never paid Oracle a penny, let alone this "hypothetical" amount, an argument it claims carries credence in law.
A hearing is scheduled for 13 July.
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Applications
You may also like
Applications jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?