Businesses may have to foot e-crime unit bill

03 May 2007

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Picture of Peter Sommer
Peter Sommer: Private funding is a bad idea

A central e-crime co-ordination unit could be entirely funded by the private sector despite having the backing of all 43 chief constables in England and Wales.

The proposed unit would oversee the reporting and investigation of cyber crimes and act as a replacement for the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit, which was disbanded in April last year.

Further reading

But no government funding has been allocated yet and businesses are being asked to foot the bill.

‘We have the go-ahead for the national unit, but this does not mean funding is in place,’ Sue Wilkinson, head of e-crime at the Association of Chief Police Officers, told a House of Lords committee last week.

‘I have no undertakings of government support, although I have not specifically asked for it yet, but we do have a plan.

‘Industry is ready with the money. Over the next few weeks I will pull that into the business case to show the Home Office.’

But there is concern that if the Home Office refuses to allocate any money, companies may be reluctant to invest.

It would not be the first time the private sector has funded criminal reporting units. The Dedicated Cheque and Plastic Crime Unit was established in 2002 and is entirely funded by banking industry body Apacs.

Peter Sommer, research fellow at the London School of Economics, says lack of government funding raises serious questions about independence.

‘The people who fund these units have a duty to shareholders to chase prosecutions in cases in which they are particularly interested. If software firms fund the unit, there will be prosecutions for software licence infringements.’

Reader comments

Footing the e-crime unit bill

I'm a bit puzzled by the reluctance of government to fund and establish the means to tackle e-crime. Surely the provision of social and public services that creates the infrastructure for a safe and secure living and working environment is what taxes are meant to cover (or used to). I could go on and cynically list where money is being wasted creating individual legacies but the idea of business directly footing the bill for an e-crime unit is preposterous and absolutely wrong. What next? Will business be expected to fund their own fire brigade? How about a privately-funded road network?

Posted by: David McAdam  03 May 2007

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

88 %

5 %

7 %