ID card critics query competitiveness of bidding process

05 Jun 2008

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Airport baggage handler
Airport workers will be among the first to receive ID cards

Last month’s announcement that all five remaining suppliers bidding for £2bn-worth of contracts for the government’s ID card programme have gone through to the next round has prompted critics to question the rigour of the procurement process.

The Identity and Passport Service (IPS) has yet to reject a single bidder from the original shortlist of eight ­- Accenture, BAE Systems and Steria dropped out of their own accord ­- while CSC, EDS, Fujitsu, IBM and Thales all went through to the next round.

Further reading

IPS operations director Bill Crothers defended the process, saying that a move to drop a supplier would have been for PR purposes alone.

“We have done what we believe is best for the project ­ and that is to have more competitive bids to choose from,” he said.

But industry insiders have started to question the competitiveness of the scheme.
“CSC in particular is over-committed with the NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT) ­ it should not still be in there,” said one source.

CSC is responsible for three of the five geographical regions of NPfIT -­ and took over some of the contracts from Accenture after the supplier pulled out citing the financial viability of the project.

Suppliers are worried that a results-based contract formula similar to that used in NPfIT will put the squeeze on their profits.

“It is no surprise three companies have dropped out already,” said one industry source. “And the Conservatives are saying they will pull the scheme if they win the next election, which looks increasingly likely.”

As the suppliers were announced, the Tories reiterated their commitment to cancel the scheme if elected -­ having already written to suppliers to inform them of this earlier in the year.

“Along with growing evidence of the risks and costs of ID cards, we have seen declining commercial interest, reflected in the dwindling numbers bidding for contracts,” said shadow home affairs spokesman David Davis.

The government has sought to allay these concerns by splitting up the scheme into a number of smaller projects, one of which it hopes to have completed before 2010.
This is a system to provide an interim capability for the ID cards that are being issued in 2009 for certain critical workers and foreign nationals.

The three-year contract will be worth about £10m, with the procurement beginning this summer.

IPS has also said that other parts of the scheme, such as the £500m application and enrolment system, will not be a waste of money if the scheme is scrapped because it can be adapted for UK passport allocation.

“The fact the government has split it up like this and is already trying to justify expenditure in the light of the scheme being potentially scrapped, suggests they are rushing parts of it ­ and this never bodes well,” said another supplier source.

But Ovum analyst Eric Woods said there is still money to be made for the vendors.
“Suppliers will have factored in political risks to the scheme, and they would have dropped out if they did not think it was worth their while,” he said.

Although the suppliers will be required to bid for different parts of the scheme, they are not contractually required to undertake some or any part of it ­ meaning they could still withdraw.

ID cards ­ a brief history

2001 Then-home secretary David Blunkett brings forward ideas for an ID card scheme in the wake of the 11 September attacks in the US. ID cards are proposed as a way of tackling terrorism, illegal immigration and identity fraud.

2004 The draft ID cards Bill and consultation paper is published. An original plan aims to take iris scans and fingerprints of applicants, with cards to be issued between 2008 and 2010. The Bill also envisages the creation of a National Identity Register with biometric and biographical details.

2006 The Identity Cards Act is given Royal Assent. New home secretary John Reid’s review of the scheme envisages that at first only those renewing their passport will have to have an ID card. To save money, the National Identity Register will be based on an existing Department of Work and Pensions customer information system.

2008 Home secretary Jacqui Smith announces that ID cards will only be compulsory for foreign nationals, airport workers and other critical staff from 2009. They will not be compulsory for other sections of the population, although after 2011 anyone renewing a passport will have their details put on the National Identity Register ­ regardless of whether or not they choose to have an ID card.

2010 Procurement of technology systems to support the scheme is staggered against a backdrop of mounting political pressure from the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats for the government to abandon the scheme.

Reader comments

Reason why we don't need these ID cards to restore honesty

Why do we need these complex ID cards when virtually all fraud crimes will be a thing of past if the government and banks exploit KEY and PIN system described on website www.xwave.co.uk?

KEY and PIN system will eliminate the need for us to protect our personal and card details since fraudsters will not get tempted to use these stolen details. Chip and PIN and proposed ID card system will not provide this unique advantage and hence these systems will fail to combat fraud the way KEY and PIN system would.

KEY and PIN system could be treated like international ID card since it will personalise signature and PIN to the right individual in any country in the world.

We hope banks and the government would exploit KEY and PIN system before it is too late to stop a fraud boom.

Posted by: Roger  05 Jun 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

83 %

4 %

2 %

11 %