03 May 2007
Apple today unveiled new environmentally friendly manufacturing policies designed to completely eliminate arsenic, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from current products by 2008. The company also forecast that it will recycle 30 per cent of its own electronic waste by 2010.
The announcement from Apple boss Steve Jobs moved the company off the bottom of the Greenpeace Green Electronics Guide, which rates large PC and mobile phone makers recycling and toxic content policies, and up to tenth place out of 14.
Greenpeace campaign co-ordinator Zeina Alhajj welcomed the move, which makes Apple's green polices transparent and accessible for the first time, as a step in the right direction.
But she added that Apple could go further by agreeing to remove all PVC and BFRs from its forthcoming iPhone, due in June, and expanding the US product take-back policy, which enables businesses and consumers to recycle old products for free by returning them to the manufacturer, to the rest of the world.
"Other companies like Nokia have already put PVC and BFR free mobiles on the market and Apple has an opportunity to do that with iPhone in June." she said. "It is unfair and represents a double standard to deny the same global take back system service available in the US for Apple customers on the rest of the planet."
Apple CEO Steve Jobs suggested that Apple was way ahead of rivals in its complete elimination of CRT monitors from its product line, higher e-waste recycling figures, and its ban on most of the chemicals covered the RoHS regulations.
"Some electronics companies can only claim their products are RoHS compliant because of certain little know exemptions granted by the EU," he said.
Far from being shamed into making changes to green policies, Apple has responded to the requests of its own Mac user base galvanised into action by the Greenpeace campaign, added Alhajj.
Having read some articles about Apple's supposed new environmental policies, I question myself where is journalism going to (at least "web journalism", if it exists). The open letter from Apple is very clear: Apple is already ahead of many main computer brands in what concerns green policies. CRTs is an example of such policies (and they were discontinued in 2006). Other facts are contained in Apple's open letter. What Jobs says is that the PR policies are going to change. GreenPeace apparently didn't know about Apple environmental policies and is trying to turn ignorance into victory (don't get me wrong: I like both Apple and GreenPeace, but clearly this time GP has been mistaken). Isn't there a difference between eliminating CRT's more than an year ago or still producing and selling them to this day? Isn't there a difference between complying with strict European regulations or hide behind an exemption or plan to comply?
Come on journalists! Do your job: get the information right. I too sympathise with GP, but this news about "GP victory"??? Come on!
[Editor's note: the IT Week article does not and never has talked of a Greenpeace victory]
Posted by: Alexandre de Carvalho 03 May 2007
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Client
You may also like
Client jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?