Nokia beats Apple as most popular for mobile advertising

By Dawinderpal Sahota

22 Sep 2010

Comments: 2

A Computing logo
Nokia phone
Nokia handsets saw the most advertisement impressions globally

Nokia handsets are more popular than the Apple iPhone as a platform for mobile advertising.

This is according to research from InMobi. The Nokia operating system (OS) claimed more than 25 per cent of the global mobile advertising market in July 2010. The Symbian open source OS had 22 per cent of the market, while the Apple iPhone OS was on just eight per cent.

Further reading

In terms of advertisement impressions, Nokia had more than five billion impressions in July, while Symbian had almost 4.5 billion and Apple 1.7 billion.

In fourth place was the Android OS with just over two per cent of the global share and a little more than 450 million impressions.

The decision by UK supermarket Tesco to focus on development for Nokia phones reflects this trend.

Last month Tesco decided to prioritise the rollout of its smartphone app for Nokia rather than Apple’s iPhone.

“It's about thinking of our customers and the sort of phones they have,” said Tesco CIO Nick Lansley on his blog, referring to "busy mums" as the supermarket chain’s target market.

“When we looked at the sort of phones [Tesco shoppers] have, we saw that plenty of them had Nokia phones."

The research is not all bad news for Apple.

InMobi’s data suggests that there is tremendous potential for the iPhone, but it added that Apple’s closed nature and premium prices will hinder its growth, particularly in emerging markets.

Android will provide Nokia with the greatest competitive challenge given its comparatively low prices and its open source nature.

The research shows that Europe is viewed as the healthiest mobile advertising market globally.

“Europe combines the wealth and media sophistication of a developed region with the complexity that often defines emerging markets such as Africa and Asia; namely multiple languages and an inherent fragmentation due to cultural and geographic boundaries,” said Rob Jonas, vice president and managing director at InMobi Europe.

“Additionally Europe has an emerging developer culture and an evolved consumer use of mobile phones relative to other regions.”

Apple was not available for comment at the time of publication.

Reader comments

inMobi only measuring WAP websites - they are irrelevant

InMobi only tracks low-bandwidth WAP "mobile" websites, whereas the vast bulk of iPhone users browse full web sites with their excellent webkit browsers.

Millennial's July 2010 report indicated iPhone users had captured 55% of web browsing amongst smartphones vs 19% for Android and 16% for BlackBerry.

Net Applications reports that iOS has overtaken Linux worldwide to become the 3rd most popular OS for web browsing (not just mobile sites) after Mac OS X at No 2 and Windows at number 1. iOS had over 5x Android's share.

Comparing only smartphones, Net Applications analysis from May 2010 (pre-iPhone 4 no less), indicated that the iPhone actually gained more global share than Android going from 30.3 per cent to 32.8 per cent in April. In the same timeframe, Android went from 5.3 per cent to 6.2 per cent. Symbian accounted for 13.98 per cent and BlackBerry captured a measly 3.59 per cent.

In other words, ignore inMobi - their data is irrelevant as WAP is most definitely ancient history.

-Mart

Posted by: Martin Hill  23 Sep 2010

What are they measuring?

Just what segment of ads is InMobi measuring? The global mobile web browser market share ratios are not at all like InMobi is reporting (see statcounter.com). It can't be ads in apps 'cause there's no correlation with the app market either.

Posted by: Grant Klassen  22 Sep 2010

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %