Firms taking a "gap year" on green IT

16 Apr 2009

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Green chip
Green IT is becoming less of a priority in a recession

Many firms will take a "gap year" from green IT projects in 2009 as they look to shore up balance sheets hit by the global economic recession, according to Gartner.

A report by the analyst found that the downturn has reduced the importance of green IT projects in 32 per cent of US organisations, 15 per cent of firms in Europe, 25 per cent in Asia / Pacific and 32 per cent in Brazil.

Further reading

The results suggest the capital expenditure required on such projects mean they could be put on hold, despite their long-term cost-saving benefits, according to Gartner analyst Simon Mingay.

"For most organisations not looking to exploit the opportunities of climate change strategically, 2009 will be a gap year for green projects lacking a short-term cost-cutting and efficiency focus," he said.

The Gartner survey of 620 IT decision-makers also found that 20 per cent of respondents had no green IT projects at all, though 45 per cent of US, 58 per cent of European and 15 per cent of Asia/Pacific respondents, said they were likely to launch such initiatives in the future.

Political and scientific imperatives around climate change will continue to push the green agenda in the long term, said Rakesh Kumar, research vice president at Gartner.

“The broad area of green IT covering areas such as carbon reporting and offsetting, videoconferencing and green procurement, will continue to be a key pillar of IT strategy and architecture during the next 10 years,” he said.

And IT services firms need to focus on the short-term benefits of green programmes if they are to sell them to customers, said Kumar.

"For technology and service providers, when considering positioning a solution as green, providers need to consider whether it will save organisations money in less than 12 to 24 months," he said.

"If not, they need to focus on the green benefits within the context of a broader business case for sustainability."

Reader comments

Green credentials will create a significant cost for businesses unless organisations get their asset registers in order

Green credentials will create a significant cost for businesses unless organisations get their asset registers in order.

Assessment of environmental practices and reporting is certainly on the increase for business and generic statements about green strategies - from procurement to recycling, carbon footprint to flexible working - will not suffice in the long term: organisations will have to prove their commitment through information transparency and auditable policies.

At the heart of such transparency will be consistent, detailed information about the life cycle of every asset - from country of origin through maintenance schedules to final disposal.

Existing green policies such as the WEEE directive and measuring carbon footprints assume a level of asset management far beyond that achieved by the majority of UK business. How many UK businesses can accurately identify the location of their WEEE equipment within the organisation and confirm when it was purchased and from whom? By linking the asset register to a document management system organisations can create the required audit trail, gaining valuable insight into their own assets and adapting to the green economy.

Yours faithfully,

Karen Conneely
Group Commercial Manager
Real Asset Management
www.realassetmgt.co.uk

Posted by: Karen Conneely  20 Apr 2009

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

81 %

5 %

2 %

12 %