18 Jul 2006
Nearly half of UK organisations risk breaching human rights legislation by monitoring employee emails without following proper policies.
Up to 44 per cent of large UK companies are potentially breaching a range of laws governing email monitoring, including the Human Rights Act 1998, the Data Protection Act 1998, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, and the Telecommunications Regulations 2000 because they monitor emails without explaining their reasons to staff, according to research from Proofpoint.
The messaging security provider says 38 per cent of companies employ a ‘corporate snoop’ to read employee email and over 60 per cent perform regular audits of outbound email.
However, only about half of UK companies have an adequate email policy that they communicate to their staff.
Although 81 per cent of companies say they have a simple or detailed written acceptable usage policy for email, only 56 per cent provide formal training for employees about email security policies, and only a third conduct formal training about external regulations that apply to the organisation’s use of email.
The findings show, however, that email policies are taken seriously by UK companies as more than one in three has sacked a worker for violation.
Mark Hughes, Proofpoint’s managing director for Europe, said: ‘It is legitimate for a company to monitor outbound email but clandestine Big Brother voyeurism is illegal. If you don’t make your staff fully aware of how and why you monitor their messages, you are snooping on them.'
'About 44 per cent of companies my be a risk because they are simply mot doing a good enough job of telling their employees about their email policies,' he said.
Nick Tsatsas, partner at Michael Simkins LLP, points out that even if companies have a legitimate business need to monitor email and internet usage, they must tell staff how, when and why it takes place.
‘It is essential for employers that wish to monitor staff email to have a considered and consistently followed email policy,’ he said.
What do you think? Email us at: feedback@computing.co.uk
I'm so glad I have just seen this. I am, at present, absent from work due to Work Related Stress. During my absence, my supervisor has given the team access to each others' e-mails but informed them first and gave them chance to delete all their personal e-mails.
I was asked to attend a meeting yesterday, whereby my supervisor and manager have now been looking at my e-mails, which were in a folder marked "Personal". Due to my absence, I was not given the chance to delete mine and I have now been told that, had I not been off work with WRS, I would have been dismissed for Gross Misconduct. I don't think this is fair.
Posted by: Alison Riley 15 Sep 2007
I am so glad I found this. My company has been monitoring my emails for about the last few months. I know this because when I resigned my boss knew all the details of the how, why and when. And I only divulged this info in emails.
Thank you so much
Posted by: Stephen Nobbs 31 May 2007
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Management
Latest videos
You may also like
Management jobs
Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?
Rubbish in... rubbish enterprise. Why proper data management is so important (video, 6 min)
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Upcoming Events
The implementation of robust, relevant digital strategies is more crucial than ever to the success of insurance businesses
Date: 01 Mar 2012
Time: 09:00am
A showcase of the latest in the information content and management
Date: 20 Mar 2012
Time: 09:00am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?