Government doubles real cost of an ID card

07 Nov 2008

Comments: 6

A Computing logo
ID cards
ID card holders will also have to pay companies to record biometrics

The government has doubled the anticipated cost to individuals of obtaining an ID card by adding a charge for collecting biometrics through the private sector.

Plans outlined by home secretary Jacqui Smith provide for high street chains such as WHSmiths or the Post Office to collect facial scans, fingerprints and eventually retinal scans for an anticipated fee of about £29 in addition to the £30 charge for issuing the card.

Further reading

The proposals have been buried in documents made available by the Home Office, but this is the first time that a senior minister has pointed them out in a major speech and guidance has been available on cost.

Smith gave the details in a speech to the Social Market Foundation in which she claimed that projected costs are falling and that an estimated £1bn will be wiped from the current estimate of £5.4bn over the next 10 years by next May, when the process of tendering contracts is due to be completed.

But her figures contrasted with the rolling 10-year estimated cost issued the same day by the Identity and Passport Service showing that projected costs have risen £53m over the past six months to a total of just over £5.1bn in set-up and running costs for domestic and foreign cards for the next decade.

Shadow Tory home secretary Dominic Grieve suggested that the extra biometric collection charge is "particularly outrageous given the current economic crisis ".

"The home secretary should stop kidding herself, admit this project is dead and devote her energies to carrying out her primary responsibility which is ensuring the safety of the citizens of this country," he said.

Liberal Democrat spokesman Chris Huhne described the newly revealed "hidden" charge as "incredible cheek".

The Home Office denied reports that plans to issue the card early to 200,000 airside airport workers next October in an 18-month trial have been scaled back because of the threat of industrial difficulties.

But the department confirmed that it is now to be limited to staff at Manchester and City of London airports, with the sweetener of the cards being issued free of charge and with a £500,000 Home Office payment to cover airport costs.

Cards are being issued to foreigners from the end of this month and will be available earlier than expected to a handful of public volunteers by the end of 2009.

Officials claimed that the rollout had always been planned for the second half of 2009 and is "still on track".

Smith said that what she termed the "market" for providing biometrics would be worth £200m.

Reader comments

Why the half measures....

Why don't we just be done with it - and all have a bar code tattooed on our foreheads (so it can be read from a distance by automated machines), together with a readable chip implant containing the relevant data (i.e. every coneivable minutiae about ourselves). After all we've nothing to fear............. the government's record stands for itself in terms of data integrity, security & concisely defined usage criteria (i.e. lack of 'function creep'). I'm sure we're all safe from mass 'profiling', where every jobsworth civil servant has access to our movements, preferances, opinions......

Posted by: Eric Blair (also known as.... ????)  11 Nov 2008

Onward Rode the 600 ...

It looks like nothing is going to stop this government initiative. It is being introduced by drip feed and back door tactics, like so much done by this disreputable government.
Civil disobedience will get you into jail, where you'll be ID'd anyway, so the only option is to elect a party committed to scrapping this horrible idea.

Posted by: MaxC  10 Nov 2008

Database state

Couple the ID cards with RFID and the central database and you get complete social surveillance tracking every move we make how far we travel how much we spend what we buy. The power the state will be able to exert over our freedoms is truly mind boggling - please visit www.no2id.net to find out why.
This is what we are entertaining when we embrace this far left security assertion that they have been slowly implanting into the public psyche over the past decade.
Allow this and we will lose more than our freedom.
Those who are not interested need to urgently become interested!

Posted by: P_Devlin  08 Nov 2008

The real cost of the ID Card and State database

The financial cost of a card, with its State database is not the only cost. The real cost is the price to our hard won privacy and human rights. Those poor soldiers who fought and suffered to defend our country must be bewildered at this disservice.

Posted by: Ade Kujore  07 Nov 2008

Careful, Jacqui!

Ooh, Jacqui's pals in the industry won't be happy if she's lowering the costs! Though I'm sure they'll creep back up some way or other ;)

Posted by: Alfred Chesterholm  07 Nov 2008

IDiocy at large

Jacqui Smith's achievements today are so modest no-one can remember them. To add to her modest tally she has just booted the cost of the useless ID card up to almost that of a (useful) passport. The allegedly secure ID system will have data prepared for it by a myriad commercial organizations, will rely on existing corrupted databases and has no obvious value. The biometrics expensively stored on the card and on a national database will seldom be checked, and if they are it will be in circumstances where a passport would probably be more useful. The outrageous invasion of civil liberties required to set the ID scheme up, and to maintain it, is for no discernible purpose. The sooner it is scrapped the better.

Posted by: Simon Evans  07 Nov 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

83 %

4 %

2 %

11 %