07 Nov 2008
The government has doubled the anticipated cost to individuals of obtaining an ID card by adding a charge for collecting biometrics through the private sector.
Plans outlined by home secretary Jacqui Smith provide for high street chains such as WHSmiths or the Post Office to collect facial scans, fingerprints and eventually retinal scans for an anticipated fee of about £29 in addition to the £30 charge for issuing the card.
The proposals have been buried in documents made available by the Home Office, but this is the first time that a senior minister has pointed them out in a major speech and guidance has been available on cost.
Smith gave the details in a speech to the Social Market Foundation in which she claimed that projected costs are falling and that an estimated £1bn will be wiped from the current estimate of £5.4bn over the next 10 years by next May, when the process of tendering contracts is due to be completed.
But her figures contrasted with the rolling 10-year estimated cost issued the same day by the Identity and Passport Service showing that projected costs have risen £53m over the past six months to a total of just over £5.1bn in set-up and running costs for domestic and foreign cards for the next decade.
Shadow Tory home secretary Dominic Grieve suggested that the extra biometric collection charge is "particularly outrageous given the current economic crisis ".
"The home secretary should stop kidding herself, admit this project is dead and devote her energies to carrying out her primary responsibility which is ensuring the safety of the citizens of this country," he said.
Liberal Democrat spokesman Chris Huhne described the newly revealed "hidden" charge as "incredible cheek".
The Home Office denied reports that plans to issue the card early to 200,000 airside airport workers next October in an 18-month trial have been scaled back because of the threat of industrial difficulties.
But the department confirmed that it is now to be limited to staff at Manchester and City of London airports, with the sweetener of the cards being issued free of charge and with a £500,000 Home Office payment to cover airport costs.
Cards are being issued to foreigners from the end of this month and will be available earlier than expected to a handful of public volunteers by the end of 2009.
Officials claimed that the rollout had always been planned for the second half of 2009 and is "still on track".
Smith said that what she termed the "market" for providing biometrics would be worth £200m.
Why don't we just be done with it - and all have a bar code tattooed on our foreheads (so it can be read from a distance by automated machines), together with a readable chip implant containing the relevant data (i.e. every coneivable minutiae about ourselves). After all we've nothing to fear............. the government's record stands for itself in terms of data integrity, security & concisely defined usage criteria (i.e. lack of 'function creep'). I'm sure we're all safe from mass 'profiling', where every jobsworth civil servant has access to our movements, preferances, opinions......
Posted by: Eric Blair (also known as.... ????) 11 Nov 2008
It looks like nothing is going to stop this government initiative. It is being introduced by drip feed and back door tactics, like so much done by this disreputable government.
Civil disobedience will get you into jail, where you'll be ID'd anyway, so the only option is to elect a party committed to scrapping this horrible idea.
Posted by: MaxC 10 Nov 2008
Couple the ID cards with RFID and the central database and you get complete social surveillance tracking every move we make how far we travel how much we spend what we buy. The power the state will be able to exert over our freedoms is truly mind boggling - please visit www.no2id.net to find out why.
This is what we are entertaining when we embrace this far left security assertion that they have been slowly implanting into the public psyche over the past decade.
Allow this and we will lose more than our freedom.
Those who are not interested need to urgently become interested!
Posted by: P_Devlin 08 Nov 2008
The financial cost of a card, with its State database is not the only cost. The real cost is the price to our hard won privacy and human rights. Those poor soldiers who fought and suffered to defend our country must be bewildered at this disservice.
Posted by: Ade Kujore 07 Nov 2008
Jacqui Smith's achievements today are so modest no-one can remember them. To add to her modest tally she has just booted the cost of the useless ID card up to almost that of a (useful) passport. The allegedly secure ID system will have data prepared for it by a myriad commercial organizations, will rely on existing corrupted databases and has no obvious value. The biometrics expensively stored on the card and on a national database will seldom be checked, and if they are it will be in circumstances where a passport would probably be more useful. The outrageous invasion of civil liberties required to set the ID scheme up, and to maintain it, is for no discernible purpose. The sooner it is scrapped the better.
Posted by: Simon Evans 07 Nov 2008
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Public Sector
Latest videos
You may also like
Public Sector jobs
Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?
Rubbish in... rubbish enterprise. Why proper data management is so important (video, 6 min)
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Upcoming Events
Join us to meet other professionals tackling this issue, and hear from Goy Roper, interim head of ICT of Norfolk County Council how his organisation deployed a flexible and intelligent network to cope with the challenge
Date: 07 Mar 2012
Time: 9am
The implementation of robust, relevant digital strategies is more crucial than ever to the success of insurance businesses
Date: 01 Mar 2012
Time: 09:00am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?