Fujitsu Services chief executive steps down

10 Dec 2008

Comments: 9

A Computing logo
Fujitsu logo
Fujitsu Services will be looking for a new chief executive

The UK chief executive at Fujitsu Services, David Courtley, has resigned after four-and-a-half years at the IT and communications group with immediate effect.

Courtley joined the firm as chief operating officer in July 2001 and was subsequently promoted to chief executive in April 2004, replacing Richard Christou who moved to the role of chairman. Christou will take the vacancy left by Courtley until a replacement is found.

Further reading

According to a spokesman at his former employer, Courtley’s departure was prompted by personal reasons and a need to move on after having made a “huge contribution” to the company, which included contract wins such as the former Inland Revenue and the NHS.

“David spent over four years at Fujitsu and has done a huge amount for the company and after doing that he felt it was time to move on, as people do,” said the spokesman.

“But I do not think that he is jumping ship to go to a competitor immediately. He will probably be weighing his options before taking on another role.”

Fujitsu's involvement in the £12.7bn NHS National Programme for IT came to an end earlier this year after a contract dispute led to the supplier being removed from its role as prime contractor for the southern region of the project.

Reader comments

The Financial Services Authority account will be next

I have heard rumours of more FJS incompetence at the FSA. From what I hear, that account is hanging by a thread due to FJS's inability to get even the basics right.

Posted by: Ex FJS  20 Jan 2009

For the record

Fujitsu walked from the NHS. This was not the issue. His failure was in not cracking the European markets.

Posted by: A dam Good man  19 Jan 2009

Incompetence

He left because he was incompetent. Fujitsu failed on health and were booted out, they are failing all over the Public Sector. He will be the first of many of the top team to go.

Posted by: Freddy  11 Jan 2009

Courtley days

As a result of the NHS debacle I ended up being made redundant after well over 10 years with the company. I am now a contractor and have the occasional Courtley day still as well as driving about in my shiny new Andy Montrose funded Land Rover Discovery from the pay-out. Who says there was no FJ bonus in 2008? Cheers Dave. Would like to see the old firm succeed though for the sake of the great folks still there.

Posted by: TheContractorKid  08 Jan 2009

bye

No more courtley days then?

Posted by: adam  04 Jan 2009

Is Fujitsu losing a valued CEO just to placate the CEO of Fujitsu Siemens following their takeover by Fujitsu?

From what I am reliably informed, Fujitsu withdrew from NHS contract after the NHS still wanted to pay nothing until solution completion. Courtley and Christou refused to play ball. Also, Fujitsu just won another NHS bid. So Courtley's resignation cannot be related to the NHS. My enquiries amongst a lot of long term staffers tell me two things. Those whose work didn't stand up to his scrutiny will breath more easily. Others say in different but consistent ways, how much they respect what David Courtley has achieved for Fujitsu. Fujitsu Group seem to be embracing what he has done to help them move into global markets. Is it worth pushing Courtley aside just to placate the CEO of Fujitsu Siemens?

Posted by: A supplier  15 Dec 2008

About time

About time, hopefully he is replaced with someone more competent!

Posted by: Ex Fujitsu  11 Dec 2008

Puzzled

What do you think is coming then?

Posted by: D Spark  11 Dec 2008

IBM Purchases Fujitsu

I believe he saw what is coming and that is why he left

Posted by: Tom Jenkins  10 Dec 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %