E-crime policy is not working

13 Dec 2007

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Picture of MI5 building
MI5's cyber crime warning is litle more than "Neighbourhood Watch"

Government policy for protecting critical businesses against electronic crime is “not fit for purpose”, according to IT security chiefs at blue-chip firms.

Despite growing concerns over cyber security ­- and recent MI5 warnings about Chinese-sponsored attacks on UK business -­ the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) is watering down its focus on e-crime.

Further reading

Private sector condemnation is growing. “It is utter bedlam and the current situation is not fit for purpose,” a chief security officer responsible for a major part of UK critical infrastructure told Computing.

“We are seeing highly dangerous attacks and all MI5 can do is send a letter - it’s like Neighbourhood Watch.”

Budgetary issues, staff cuts and fragmented responsibility is making a mockery of the UK’s national security, claim critics.

Last month Soca chairman Stephen Lander admitted his organisation will have to shrink to balance its books ­ with rumours of staff cuts as high as 400.

And Sharon Lemon, head of Soca e-crime, is now to take charge of a second, and possibly also a third, department, Computing has learned.

Pressure is mounting for the Home Office to provide £1.3m for a proposed e-crime co-ordination unit to be based at London’s Scotland Yard ­ which is designed to plug the gaps between Soca and local police forces.

Businesses have been left in the dark since the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit was disbanded in 2006, said ICI chief security officer Paul Simmonds.“We have seen a reduction in service and it is vital this unit is funded to take up the slack,” he said.

The problem is the lack of focus, according to John Meakin, chief security officer at Standard Chartered bank.

“The security of information presents challenges for all parts of the economy, government and industry, and there will be times when we need to call on expertise from the police,” said Meakin.

“At the moment, fostering that expertise is not being addressed.”

Alliance & Leicester chief security officer George Hazell said: “The threat is real and growing, and law enforcement must be able to provide a commensurate response.”

It is time for the government to take control of an issue which is of vital importance to the critical national infrastructure, said Institute of Information Security Professionals chairman Paul Dorey.

“An act of leadership is needed to enable law enforcement to keep up with the challenge of electronic attacks,” he said.

Reader comments

IT security model is not fit 4 purpose.

The Lords said: "The Net is the New Wild West!(WW)"
My thoughts: The WW wasn't won by "putting the wagons in a circle" (Eg firewalls and IT security) It was won by the Long Knives and Smallpox infected blankets.
The Indians (hackers and cyber terrorists) were massacred in their camps.
The IT Model. 1/ Legal warning that any intrusion will be met with an excessive, violent counter-attack (NOT DDOS).
Attack the attackers.
Be your own policeman, judge, jury, EXECUTIONER and undertaker, in a cyber sense.
Just like real world terror, the only good one is a dead one.. two in the centre of the chest and at least one in the head when they are on the ground!
All cyber attacks need to be identified and then taken out. Usually police action is not possible due to location anywhere on the globe.
This would also discourage ISPs from hosting cyber terror and make cyber cafes a lot more responsible.
I have done it three times when I defended a site under attack from unstable areas in the Middle East. And the attacks soon stopped

Posted by: mike mordechai  21 Jan 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %