UK government ignores open-source potential

27 Feb 2007

Comments: 2

A Computing logo
Houses of Parliament

The UK government is biased against the use of open-source technology, a situation that could limit the computing skills of the future workforce, according to experts attending the launch of the National Open Centre (NOC) this week.

Speaking at the launch event at the Houses of Parliament, John Pugh MP argued that there is “widespread ignorance” within the public sector about open-source.

Further reading

“Large tranches of Whitehall don’t know what open-source is,” Pugh argued. “We need a partnership approach for public-sector procurement and open-source scores well in this respect. But open-source has its enemies and its enemies are very close to government, including those at the top of government who are intending to stay there.”

Pugh, who is the primary sponsor of an Early Day Motion on Software that promotes the use of open-source technology in education, warned that the focus on proprietary technology within schools and universities could be detrimental to the UK workforce of the future. “I fear that children in our schools can do PowerPoint slides and use Word, and all the other things that children in other countries can do,” he said. “But they won’t have the understanding of the fundamentals of computing.”

Pugh conceded that there were issues with open-source technology that needed to be addressed. “There are concerns about the longevity and sustainability of open-source vendors, and there are some variable, uneven products that we wouldn’t want schools having to come to terms with,” he explained. “And open-source isn’t always so good at salesmanship.”

Pugh also called on open-source supporters to unite to help promote acceptance. “There are divisions within the open-source community. But it’s not a moral principle, it’s a design principle,” he argued. “There’s no point in hardening divisions between people who have [different approaches].”

Ed Downs, research manager at the National Computing Centre, a founding member of the NOC, agreed that there was a need to tackle open-source divisions. “There are lots of different points of view, but we need to try and get through the heat and focus on clear issues to make progress,” he added.

Reader comments

Damning with faint praise

Whilst I applaud John Pugh's sentiments so clearly expressed in his Early Day Motion his comments here culled from the NOC launch would certainly not earn him a place on my sales team.

To single out open source software as being variable in quality, thereby implying that proprietary software is not, beggars belief.

Successful open source software is typified by the highest of standards of engineering and ease of use. Many rival proprietary products owe their market place in contrast to unlimited marketing budgets not high standards.

When he deals with vendor stability and the need for a united approach the same message is given... don't touch these open source flakes with a barge pole.

I hope John is not one of the powerful people with vested interests he darkly refers to.

Posted by: John Spencer  28 Feb 2007

Give open source a try!

Open source operating systems, such as Ubuntu Linux, are perfectly adequate for those who wish, among other things, to:
1. Produce documents. - OpenOffice can work with .doc format for example.
2. Browse the Net. Use the best browser available - Firefox!
3. Email. Use Thunderbird or other email clients.

The unofficial Ubuntu 'Ultimate Edition' is also well worth a look.

As a UK taxpayer I think that the Government should look seriously at open source.

Posted by: Brian  28 Feb 2007

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Will Facebook be able to continue its success as a public company?

Facebook has filed for an initial public offering (IPO) that plans to raise $5bn worth of shares on the US stock market, making it the biggest tech IPO ever. Will Facebook be able to continue its success as a public company?

63 %

1 %

7 %

28 %

1 %