28 May 2009
A government initiative that requires IT suppliers bidding for public sector contracts to have robust training regimes in place could exclude small firms from winning business, according to experts.
Skills secretary John Denham announced last week that all IT firms will be expected to train employees to a certain level before winning government contracts as part of a drive to bridge the IT skills gap in the UK.
But Peter Scargill, IT chairman at the Federation of Small Businesses, said the move would be another blow to small suppliers already struggling in the recession.
“This is ridiculously short sighted. There is a recession going on and the government is just making it harder for small businesses that need its support at this difficult time,” he said.
“This shows any previous commitments to helping small business win government contracts are just lip service.”
The government has made a number of announcements over the past few years to try to open up contracts to smaller firms, but Scargill said the deals are still dominated by the big players.
A senior figure at one major government IT supplier agreed that last week’s announcement will favour bigger firms.
“Those who can tick the boxes on this initiative will be the bigger companies. The government needs to be careful it is not erecting higher barriers to entry,” said the source.
“We will be able to ride out the recession without cutting training, but smaller suppliers won’t.”
The government spends £14bn a year procuring IT services and the latest move is designed to make sure that money helps to improve the skills base of the IT workforce.
Last week, Denham met government chief information officer John Suffolk and leading IT firms including Logica, Cable & Wireless, EDS, IBM and Atos Origin, Fujitsu and Accenture to discuss the initiative. There were no representatives of smaller IT firms at the meeting.
Has the government made this decision because of the inferior work past IT suppliers have provided for them, due to the fact that no training was identified within these companies. I think not. Shouldn't all tenders be viewed. The work then offered to the provider who has the right solution.
Posted by: margaret elliott 22 Jun 2009
This government are determined to wipe out small IT companies, and this is just another way of making sure that all public sector contracts are awarded to their friends (Logica, Cable & Wireless, EDS, IBM and Atos Origin, Fujitsu and Accenture ) who will export the jobs (and money) wherever they can, and import fast-track visa people from the third world wherever they can't. Small companies who can't offer directorships/consultancies/etc to failed/retired politicians/ senior public servants are never included in government lists of preferred suppliers even though (until recently) the vast majority of UK IT people were employed in such companies - of course, they are mainly on the dole now, and about to be joined by thousands of new IT graduates. This government ha got to go, and the current record (90% of government IT contracts fail) shows that the "preferred list" should go with them.
Posted by: Reg 28 May 2009
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Careers and Skills
Latest videos
You may also like
Careers and Skills jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?