02 Mar 2010
Prime Minister Gordon Brown has renewed his commitment to the National Police DNA Database in a major speech promising to put new measures against anti-social behaviour at the heart of his General Election campaign.
He also defended the explosion in CCTV networks and the systems used to control them.
Further reading
Brown claimed DNA technology had been crucial in bringing criminals to justice with 832 positive matches to records in the database in cases of rape, murder and manslaughter.
He said: "Some argue that liberty dictates we should immediately wipe everyone who has been arrested but not convicted of an offence from the DNA database.
"But if we did this, some sickening crimes would have gone unsolved, and many dangerous criminals would have remained at large."
He gave the example of a wheelchair-bound rape victim attacked by a man who tricked his way into her home in 1991 and left a DNA sample.
No suspect was found at the time, but in 2007 a police "cold case" team reinvestigated and a match was made with a man arrested in 2005 on a public order offence - he had not been convicted.
The man, Jeremiah Sheridan, was traced to Australia and eventually sentenced to 16 and a half years in prison.
the Prime Minister gave no explanation as to why police failed to carry out a proper trawl in 2005 when a sample was taken from Sheridan that would have linked him to the crime.
Brown added: "The next time you hear somebody question the profiles from those who have been arrested but not convicted, remember Jeremiah Sheridan and the innocent woman he attacked."
He insisted CCTV reduces the fear of crime and said this justified government funding for 700 town-centre schemes.
Thanks for the useful link Tim. It is a useful reminder how propaganda works. Take an emotional case like the one cited by the Prime Minister, some dodgy statistics, and hey presto its OK to break a Human Rights Court Ruling.
I liked the following conlusion:
"Both Prime Minister and Home Secretary have used a figure for DNA matches to support their argument that the DNA database has a significant role to play in solving crime. The statistic is correct but it does not support this argument. Without caveat or explanation it has the potential to mislead."
Posted by: Marcus Lasance 04 Mar 2010
The perpetrator of this sickening crime would still have been caught, but years earlier, if the police had done their job. No reason to keep innocent people on the data base just to cut them some slack! If the police forensically investigated more crime scenes ( currently less then 20% of crime scenes are treated this way) we would catch even more criminals, and without breaking human rights and privacy laws!
Posted by: Marcus Lasance 03 Mar 2010
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Public Sector
Latest videos
You may also like
Public Sector jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?
