Unilever boosts procurement processes

23 Feb 2009

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
supermarket shelves
Unilever is streamlining its procurement capabilities

Unilever has signed a contract with IBM to support the management of procurement for its European non-production items (NPI) operation.

The deal is expected to allow the consumer goods manufacturer to improve management as well as enhance business governance and process compliance over a two-year phased programme.

Further reading

Unilever's European procurement system will receive additional functionality from an integrated procure-to-pay process, which it is hoped will drive significant benefits.

Routine elements of Unilever's NPI procurement will be serviced by IBM from Hungary and the hosted global procurement system will be implemented in Europe with maintenance services carried out in India.

This follows the two firms' existing relationship in procurement implementations for other regions and the current finance business services agreement in Europe.

Reader comments

Outsourcing IT is fine, but Unilever has outsourced EVERYTHING!

Unilever Pakistan makes an enormous profit from the country's best-selling tea brands Lipton & Brooke Bond, but doesn't take responsibility for any of the tea workers who produce it. The workers are 100% outsourced, so they are 100% disposable. They are casualties of a scheme that blends the world's biggest tea brands, Lipton & Brooke Bond, with insecurity, injustice and poverty wages, in my opinion.

If you'd like to help these workers to break out of poverty, then go to the Casual-T website and send a protest message to Unilever!

http://www.iuf.org/casualtea/

Posted by: Hidayat  24 Feb 2009

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %