Perot deal rejig

03 Jul 1997

Be the first to comment

A Computing logo

Europcar is reviewing the future of Greenway - a huge client-server system built by Perot Systems - after several major crashes cost the company 'a six-figure sum a day', writes Chiyo Robertson.

The car rental company has also restructured its outsourcing deal with Perot to overcome service-level agreement (SLA) and under-resourcing problems.

Greenway is an Oracle-based 3,800-user system running on Sequent hardware in nine countries. Two weeks ago it went down for four days after a network failure and disk crash, forcing staff to resort to manual procedures.

Pascal Adam, Europcar's head of Greenway, estimated the company can lose up to a six-figure sum a day when the system crashes. 'Perot is running our business in terms of IT. In a facilities management deal, you don't often have enough contact with your supplier,' he said.

Under-staffing is rumoured to be the cause of problems. Adam told Computing Perot's contract had been 'renegotiated a month ago to address SLAs and under-staffing'.

Perot has added 10 extra staff to the account. Europcar is currently in negotiations with Perot executives about penalty payments.

Perot Systems' Scott Lang, who handles the Europcar account, said: 'We agreed to restructure the deal. We are optimistic about Greenway.'

The system was built after Perot scooped Europcar's #322m, 10-year outsourcing contract in 1992. But in March, problems ensued when Perot upgraded three Sequent nodes to two, higher-throughput nodes, but had to revert back to three nodes.

Europcar plans to upgrade Greenway this year and may choose a different platform.

Reader comments

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %