William Hill reports negative online results

29 Feb 2008

Be the first to comment

A Computing logo
Dice
Online operations at William Hill underperformed

Gaming group William Hill saw poor performance by its interactive channel but further investment in IT is still on the cards.

Revenue for the division slumped by £10.7m to £119.8m and profit decreased by £10.6m to £50.9m during the period.

Further reading

The group also eported an 11 per cent decrease in pre-tax profits to nearly £210m. But gross win, which represents what customers lose, rose by six per cent to £983.7m.

The inflexibility of the company's IT infrastructure was to blame.

"The limitations of our technology prevented us from matching the increasing number of betting opportunities available from our competitors," said a statement from William Hill.

Although the company hoped to start its IT overhaul last year, the NextGen project was scrapped because needed greater investment and take longer than originally envisaged.

The decision resulted in losses of £20.9m in the 2007 results and further charges of around £4m expected to be incurred in 2008.

But the company wants to repair the damage via investment in restructuring.

"This will be a transitional year for the interactive channel as we make the necessary investments to lay the foundations for future growth," said chairman Charles Scott.

"The most significant of these is the replacement of our interactive sportsbook technology system with a more flexible platform," he said.

The company's plans will also focus on exploiting the opportunities available to online gaming business, said Scott.

Reader comments

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %