Lib Dems vote down e-petitions plan

15 Sep 2008

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg
Clegg: Scrap ID cards

A bid to commit the Liberal Democrats to an e-petition system capable of vetoing unpopular new laws has been defeated at the party's annual conference in Bournemouth.

Supporters of the move said they fear some form of the proposal - under which a referendum on proposed legislation would be required if a million voters signed an e-petition to parliament opposing it - may now be taken up by the Tories.

Further reading

Party activists supported a motion favouring replacing the existing paper-based petition system with one requiring MPs to consider issues which gain sufficient support, with the six most popular proposals each year guaranteed a full-scale debate in the House of Commons.

But they opposed the idea of allowing a reactionary majority of voters to delay or block progressive ideas, despite pleas to "trust the people", claiming it would be too easy for right-wing pressure groups to secure sufficient backing online.

Supporters said that giving switched-off younger voters a real say which could affect the outcome would help mend "broken" democracy.

The debate kicked off a conference at which party leader Nick Clegg and shadow chancellor Vince Cable made clear they would seek to ditch remaining delayed components of the NHS computer system, as well as drop the government's ID cards scheme to save money to fund other social objectives, including tax cuts.

The Labour government is committed to a watered-down version of a parliamentary e-petitions system - but probably not until after the next general election in 2010. The Tories have no official line.

On Wednesday this week, the Liberal Democrats will vote on plans to strengthen the powers of the Information Commissioner to include inspecting private as well as public sector databases containing personal information, and to increase civil and criminal sanctions for the misuse of personal data.

Reader comments

Online petitions would not help democracy

The United Kingdom has the oldest democracy on the planet. It is based on a principal called representative democracy by which we elect representatives to make decisions on our behalf. Whilst this system may have its faults our representatives, their advisors, and the civil servants that support them ensure that they have access to all the facts before they cast their vote. How many people who will happily sign online petitions would actually be prepared to spend the necessary hours wading through green papers and white papers beforehand to ensure that they are making informed decisions? Online petitions are a great way to let the Government know what people think, and are a valuable way for them to gather opinion, but at the end of the day we must let our representatives make the final decision. There are a lot of things I don't like about our system of democracy, but actually I cannot find a better example today. So please leave alone until you are 100% sure any change will truly improve the situation.

Posted by: Nick Morgan  15 Sep 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

88 %

5 %

7 %