Flexible working could change the UK - and save £32bn

26 Aug 2009

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Exeter Cathedral
Research suggests many office workers would like to relocate to areas such as Devon

UK businesses could save up to £32bn a year in transport costs if the workforce of tomorrow were encouraged to work from home, according to research commissioned by Orange.

And a move to remote working could have a big effect on the structure of firms, according to the study carried out by YouGov.

Further reading

The survey found that 16 per cent of respondents would be willing to take an average of £6,900 salary cut and 42 per cent would be happy to forfeit their company car if it meant they could live and work in their ideal location.

More than a quarter (27 per cent) would forfeit the seniority of their role and a quarter (25 per cent) their future job progression to make their ideal work-life balance scenario a reality.

Robert Ainger, director of corporate marketing for Orange, said flexible working presents a significant opportunity for businesses to save money and improve employee morale.

"Setting up an employee to work from home needn’t involve significant investment, just the willingness to give them the tools they need to get the job done. Rather than waiting for the current economic climate to improve, savvy businesses will act now to reap the rewards offered by flexible working,” he said.

The survey of 3,281 UK office workers also found that a national move to remote working could have a significant effect on the location of the population.

Although 40 per cent of office workers are happy in their current work location, according to the study 39 per cent would rather live and work by the seaside, the countryside or the mountains.

The responses show a desire to move away from the UK’s traditional industrial and economic hubs such as the North East and the Midlands to more rural locations such as Devon.

The South West, currently the fifth most populous region in the UK, would be by far the most popular region in which to live, with London coming in at second place.

Nearly half (49 per cent) of office workers moved to their current location because of a job offer, according to the research, with only four per cent of workers in their current location because of its proximity to family and friends.

But given the opportunity of flexible working in a universally connected Britain, 26 per cent of people would choose a specific location because of its proximity to family and friends.

Commenting on the research, futurologist James Bellini said the economy would benefit from people being able to work from wherever they choose.

"This will generate substantial economic returns as 'e-workers' of the future will be more productive, better motivated and happier. In turn, the businesses they work for will be more adaptable, more responsive to changing market conditions and more profitable,” he said.

Reader comments

What are we waiting for?

I am so glad to hear that research backs up what to me is obvious. What is the point in all of our excellent communication technology, if we fail to use it imaginatively?

If you have the dubious pleasure of driving to and from work every day, or maybe worse still, travel by train, when you look at the faces of the other commuters, do they look as if this is the best part of their day? I don't think so; it's a terrible waste of time and resources.

Most people have to spend a large proportion of their salary on travel costs and while of course there will always be lots of people who have to go to a particular place to do work, why do the rest of us have to clutter up the roads, fill up trains etc., just to sit at a desk that could just as easily be in our own home, or situated in some kind of 'community office' within walking distance of home?

Yet there is still something holding back too many employers from being open to the idea of allowing people to work from home. In my own experience, having worked in an organisation that allowed me to reduce my hours so that I could study and to work from home from time to time, I have proved that these were actually great efficiencies and my employer gained better productivity from me in this way.

There remains, however, a lot of prejudices regarding working from home and many people still regard a day 'working from home' to mean a cheeky day off!

In my experience, it means a more productive day and one less car on the roads during rush hour. My answer to those who worry that they can't check up on people is that just because someone is sitting at their desk, or walking about the place holding a folder, doesn't mean they are working!

Proof of attendance is not proof of work. If you don't know whether or not your employee is getting their job done and only require their presence, then I would have to question your management ability. Yes there needs to be an element of trust too, but ultimately, isn't getting the job done what we all want to achieve?

So why is change so slow? What are we waiting for? When it is so obvious that for many people, the option to work mainly from home would be beneficial financially, for work life balance and for environmental benefits, like fewer cars on the road, why is there still such a lot of reluctance to embrace such a change?

Posted by: Anne Kermarrec  24 Nov 2009

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

81 %

4 %

3 %

12 %