The faint-hearted need not apply, says Granger

21 Jun 2007

Be the first to comment

A Computing logo
Picture of Richard Granger
'Despite all the twaddle, the programme is under-budget,' says Granger

Outgoing NHS IT director general Richard Granger says the job his successor faces is not for the faint-hearted.

Granger, who has run the £12bn National Programme for five years, announced this week that he will leave in the next few months.

Further reading

Despite being billed as the UK’s highest-paid civil servant, he says that the time he puts in brings his pay down to ‘considerably less than £50 per hour’.

‘One of the big challenges is that there are three moving parts to deal with: the political and stakeholder machine; the vast quantities of IT; and a whole bunch of new-build activity,’ he said.

‘You are continuously trading those three things in an environment with a high degree of scrutiny and scale.’

Granger is bullish about his successes, and continues to refute criticism of the programme’s central control. ‘We have delivered the best part of 20,000 applications and put in place a messaging architecture that will support the ever-changing structure of the NHS,’ he said.

‘There are now more than 100 applications that are NPfIT-compliant. This isn’t a monolithic approach, it is a messaging architecture that supports heterogeneous software in a heterogeneous environment.’

He also denies claims of cost overruns. ‘Despite all the twaddle written about costs, the programme is under-budget,’ said Granger.

‘None of the spin from people who want to kick the government, with silly numbers about NPfIT costing £30bn, has any substance.’

Reader comments

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

63 %

13 %

2 %

22 %