Southwark Council sues IBM for £700,000

30 Oct 2009

Comments: 6

A Computing logo
IBM office
IBM faces a legal battle with Southwark Council

Southwark Council has launched a £700,000 legal battle against IBM in a row over a new computer system.

The council said it has lost confidence in IBM’s credibility and integrity, and does not believe it will ever be able to have a workable business relationship in future. Now the council is demanding damages of £717,061 from IBM after branding the new system defective.

In 2005, Southwark wanted to install a new computer system allowing different departments to share information through a central repository of key data, called a master data management system, according to a High Court writ.

The council considered a rival system before going ahead with a contract with IBM, running to 19 pages, in which it agreed to pay £259,112 for the IBM Websphere software licence. The council also agreed to pay £99,124 for skilled staff to implement the system, and £67,000 for the final piece of the system, Orchard’s ArcIndex, as well as consultancy services and support and maintenance, it is alleged.

But a preliminary review of the system in July 2007 found problems, including a serious deficiency with a vital system component, Orchard ArcIndex, the writ says.

There were also problems with the user interface, messaging integration, matching strategy, and a lack of reporting capabilities, the writ claims.

The council brands the system unfit for purpose and of unsatisfactory quality, and accuses IBM of failing to use reasonable skill and care when designing and testing the system. IBM also negligently claimed during negotiations that the system would meet the council’s requirements, but these claims were false, and the system could not deliver its requirements, the writ claims.

IBM failed to research solutions after a workshop to resolve problems, the writ says. The council argues that although it tried to mitigate its loss by trying to find a solution with IBM that would make the system work, IBM tried to absolve itself from any responsibility for the software even though the contract for ArcIndex was an essential part of the system, it is alleged.

The writ was issued by Deborah Collins of the council’s legal department.

Computing has requested a comment from IBM.

Reader comments

Goverment rely on contractors to use the best technologies?

Yes it's true that's the offical line. I wonder does IBM understand this? Or do they rub their hands with glee and impose their acquired old disconnected technologies with guaranteed lock-in and hope the customer notices too late. Well done Southwark for standing up to them. Let this be a warning to others not to blindly believe suppliers are there to help you .They are there to help themselves, never forget it!

Posted by: David Chassels  11 Dec 2009

You cant blame Indians for IBM

It is down to how IBM manages its clients and nothing to do with software developed in India. Give some evidence before you blame outsourcing to India!

Posted by: indiansoftwareconsultant  05 Nov 2009

What's wrong with IBM?

IBM has a high reputation for quality products and excellent service, built up over many years.
They now seem to have lost focus on customer service, quality solutions, and on motivating their staff, judging by recent experience.

Posted by: Concerned user  02 Nov 2009

IBM has truly lost the plot

IBM has changed from being a company that gave great customer service and had great respect for the individual including employees to a company that is run by short-termist executives who are solely interested in becoming even more obscenely rich with no care for the long term future of IBM. You just have to look at this forum http://www.amipp.org.uk/phorum5/list.php?23 to understand how IBM is demoralising its employees.

Posted by: Retired IBM UK employee  02 Nov 2009

IBM can not execute on their business commitments

The ability for IBM to execute on their business is non-existent. They trimmed fat and now have no value. Fat in this case being experience and ability.

Posted by: anon  02 Nov 2009

It's No Secret Anymore. IBM Is Overpriced. No Support. No Quality

It's no secret in the IT profession that IBM is not the place to go if you want a working secure IT infrastructure or application.
For years IBM has been firing its knowledgeable staff and replacing them with unskilled uncaring staff - mostly in India.
Customer support is also just something for your wish list.
Our firm also learned the hard way. After firing IBM we have cut our IT costs by 55% and down time is almost nonexistent.
With IBM hardware being manufactured in Communist China (who knows what is really in the hardware), and software in India, it's no wonder nothing works well (if at all).
The state of Indiana just fired IBM as well. Given more than a fair amount chances, IBM just couldn't get it together.
IBM used to mean quality, IBM can not rest on its laurels forever.

Posted by: Ex_IBM_Customer  30 Oct 2009

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

80 %

5 %

2 %

13 %