This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. > Find out more here

 

RIP Bill could cost £34m

02 May 2000

View Comments
A Computing logo

Critics have slammed an independent report into the UK government's proposed communications snooping bill which puts an estimated £34m price tag on the bill's implementation.

The proposed Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill, which has been the subject of much debate, will require ISPs to provide facilities to intercept e-mails - or future electronic communications formats - for surveillance organisations such as the police.

Industry think tank the Foundation for Information Policy Report (FIPR) claimed that the brunt of the £34m implementation would be borne by ISPs and taxpayers.

The government had previously said it may cover "marginal" costs associated with the bill and has denied reports that costs would be high.

The 72-page report, compiled by the Smith Group for the Home Office, recommends three schemes for intercepting traffic on the internet: an "active" scheme, which intercepts only e-mail at an ISP's server, and "semi-active" and "passive" schemes, which are two ways of intercepting all of an individual's traffic, including e-mail, web browsing and voice over IP.

The Smith Group recommends that all ISPs deploy the e-mail interception scheme and estimates that it will cost a large ISP £113,000 in the first year and £44,700 each year thereafter. A small ISP will pay £44,700 in the first year and £19,400 each year thereafter, says the group.

Caspar Bowden, FIPR director, said: "The Government has been telling us for weeks that the million-pound price tags put on interception were just scaremongering.

Now its own consultants think it will be more than £30m, and that's only the beginning, before the next wave of broadband e-commerce is rolled out in 2001, with third generation mobile internet following in 2002.

"It also does not take into account the cost to the taxpayer of processing and safeguarding the intercepted material, or answer the basic question of whether interception will continue to be useful for law enforcement as encryption becomes widely used for personal and business applications."

Reader comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Newsletters

Does Google know too much about you?

Google's linked data policy, which came into effect on March 1, allows the company to collect information about its users across all its products, services and websites and store it in one place. This has been criticised by organisations ranging from CNIL to Microsoft, all of whom have expressed concerns that it's difficult to tell which data Google collects and how it's used. Now the Information Commissioner's Office is investigating whether Google's privacy policy is compliant with UK law. Are you worried that Google knows too much about you?

41 %

5 %

15 %

39 %