25 Mar 2009
Work has been halted on ContactPoint, the £224m database designed to hold the details of 11 million children under 18, while problems in the system are ironed out.
The problems centre on the so-called "shielding" part of the system, which protects certain elements of the details of 55,000 vulnerable children.
Further reading
Most children's records contain their name, address, date of birth and details of schools, GPs, social workers and support services. But some vulnerable children are shielded to provide only their name, sex and age to the 400,000 children’s services workers with access to the database.
But this shielding has disappeared from the records of some children when information is uploaded to the database.
A third of England's 150 local authorities have not yet signed off the first phase of ContactPoint and many refuse to do so until the problems are sorted out.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Children, Schools and Families insisted the problem will not delay plans for the system to go live this year.
"Our colleagues have been working very quickly with local authority representatives to put the problems right. Fifty per cent of problems flagged up have already been identified as human error," she said.
She added that the unshielded details had only been exposed to the 300 local authority workers who were updating the system, all of whom had been vetted and cleared to access the children's information.
Tim Loughton, shadow children's minister, said the government could not be trusted to set up large databases.
"ContactPoint is not even live and it is coming apart at the seams. The government should have foreseen these issues five years ago when they first drew up plans for this expensive and unnecessary database," he said.
It's not an issue about data security (which you are never going to get anyway) - the point is that most children don't need this "protection".
The information itself is so woefully inaccurate and often vindictive that the database will cause misery to ordinary families, without helping seriously abused kids one jot.
Families in crisis need financial and practical support, not policing. The £250m would have been better spent by allocating £5,000 to each child in crisis.
Posted by: Gary Orman 18 May 2009
I personally cannot see a reason for this database, these sort of details are already stored in other places so why join them all together ? whom is watching us now and for what reason!. I have ranted about databases here, http://anyrant.com/content/government-databases arhh governments and their data!
Posted by: Ian rants 07 Apr 2009
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Public Sector
You may also like
Public Sector jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?