Green IT: fact or fiction?

29 Jan 2007

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Picture of green computing logo

Dell and HP both claim to be leading the way in Green IT, but there is some difficulty in making sense of the initiatives, according to analyst Butler Group.

Michael Dell, founder and chairman of Dell, announced at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas earlier this month, that it was time IT took a lead in environmental issues.

Dell announced a ‘plant a tree for me’ programme at the show, giving the customer the option of volunteering US$2 (£1) for a laptop or US$6 (£3) for a desktop, as a donation that will be used to fund a worldwide tree planting programme.

The programme will offset the carbon emitted generating the power used to run the equipment during its lifetime, which Dell have estimated is three years.

But Roy Illsley, senior research analyst at Butler Group, says customers need to verify if schemes equate to being carbon-neutral, or are just a marketing ploy.

'Dell did not say if it was donating any funding to the programme to cover the carbon emissions generated in manufacture, and more importantly it did not include server products in the scheme,' said Illsley. 'Servers use more power than laptop or desktop devices because they are typically run 24x7, while laptop and desktops normally operate only eight to ten hours per day.'

Research by 1E, a UK-based desktop management vendor, shows that an average desktop consumes 200W, and that US$6 (£3) would need to fund the planting of considerably more than four trees to be carbon-neutral.

Illsley compares this case to that of HP. HP has been recycling products since 1987; it developed the Designed for Environment (DfE) policy in 1992, and entered into a joint initiative with the World Wildlife Fund US (WWF-US) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its operating facilities worldwide in 2006.

'As HP clearly demonstrates, if you do not generate headline-grabbing announcements that are aimed at the customers, then your efforts will largely go unrecognized,' said Illsley. 'We predict that 2007 will become the green year, with many more carbon-neutral initiatives being announced by leading vendors. The difficulty will be making sense of the initiatives, and verifying if they do equate to carbon-neutral, or are just a marketing ploy.'

What do you think? Email us at: feedback@computing.co.uk

Further Reading:

Green Computing - Special report

Stern report to spark surge in green IT

HSBC switches to green computing

Reader comments

Good points - more behind announcements

Tom Young's story makes some very good points, namely that commitment to environmental responsiblity cannot be PR-schemes. I do happen to work for Dell on environment issues so certainly have a particular point of view. I did think it important to point out a few things. First, most importantly, Dell has not assumed that the tree planting programme is a be-all, end-all environment programme - it is merely the latest effort launched to partner with customers to protect the environment. Second, that the energy efficiency of products can do more to protect climate than offset programmes and Dell has committed to provide the most energy-efficient products in the industry. Finally, that Dell has also offered product recycling for a number of years and in fact has an industry-first global, free, programme in place for consumers. We welcome any questions or comments about Dell's environmental efforts, thank you for raising this important topic.

Posted by: Bryant at Dell  29 Jan 2007

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

65 %

14 %

2 %

19 %