01 Dec 2008
Enterprise IT professionals are suffering in their roles because their employers have an ill-defined view of the role and its scope, according to a new report from Cranfield School of Management (CMS) and consultants Deloitte.
The report found that the CIO role was suffering because many firms could not see how they contributed to overall business needs and strategies.
Further reading
Professor Chris Edwards from the Cranfield School of Management, said that tensions could arise between the CIO and the rest of the firm when this disconnection occured.
"The role of the CIO is transitory; it has a clear beginning, middle and end, " he said.
"Our research has identified five states of information and technology leadership, only three of which will require a CIO. It is critical that the organisation identifies and deploys the ‘appropriate’ CIO type for their current need. Frustration and confusion occur in situations where an ‘inappropriate’ CIO type is deployed.”
The Cranfield study said that although the role of the CIO was long-established, IT was still very much viewed as a back-office function. This, it said, leads to key strategic decisions being made without IT's involvement. CIOs are most effective in roles that allowed them to contribute in a strategic manner.
“The information age may be upon us, but the value of information has yet to be fully exploited by British companies. Many companies are not using their information assets to power innovation, strategy and growth. The CIO should be playing a central role in business, ensuring information underpins business strategy,” said David Tansley, a partner at Deloitte.
Cranfield spoke to many CIOs who said they felt that they could also be to blame for the confusion around the role.
"I’ve seen CIOs transformed from being an aggressive, positive bunch to being extremely timid – within just a decade or so," said Toby Redshaw, CIO at Aviva.
"CIOs have been absolutely hammered by businesses, because IT has so often disappointed. And CIOs have to take part of the blame – not only for poor execution but also for poor management of expectations."
My empathy bones are twitching. This post resonates strongly with me. Poor requirements definition is a problem suffered long in terms of job descriptions and information requirements definition. Why? because IT and business speak a different language. Communication breakdowns between IT and business is the top reason for IT project over-runs and failures (as pointed out by Information Week last year).
You might be interested in our solution to this problem? www.knowledgegenes.com
Posted by: Mark Ridgwell 13 Jul 2009
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Management
Latest videos
You may also like
Management jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?