27 Sep 2010
There is a very real danger that policy-makers will overlook one critical factor in their regulatory offensive on the banking industry; the role of technology – especially IT.
High-profile issues such as the inquiry into competition; the possible split up of the banks as a response to fears of systemic risk; and the examination of a perceived lack of finance for the UK’s businesses represent just a small cross-section of the regulatory pressures that the industry is currently facing. There are many more.
It is not unreasonable to fear that if this one key factor is ignored, the foundations upon which reforms of this breadth and scale are built will crumble.
It is technology that underpins the 5.7 billion automated payments that are made through the UK’s banking system on an annual basis and without which the 40 million online bank accounts that are registered in the UK would not be able to function. It is IT of varied sophistication and application that underpins a multitude of front and back office functions in every financial services organisation in the world.
It is technology, therefore, that should be front and centre of policy makers’ considerations when they examine the regulatory options that will shape the industry for years to come. Unfortunately, this is not currently the case.
By facilitating greater, more accurate flows of information within and between banks, technology can diminish the threat of bank failure and systemic risk. Many Intellect members believe that had regulators been able to view the build up of systemic risk at an earlier stage and act appropriately, a real possibility with today’s technology, the negative effects of the 2008 banking crisis could have been significantly reduced.Add your comment
Reader comments
John,
You highlight one of the key issues facing finance and, by extension, the economy in the UK and beyond.
I agree with you, that
“By facilitating greater, more accurate flows of information within and between banks, technology can diminish the threat of bank failure and systemic risk.”
Understanding flow is the key to creating the business clarity that finance needs.
Banks’ product is money. Today, most money exists in the form of data. Banks ‘pump’ this data around the globe, through people, systems and hardware, trying to make a profit on various transactions.
But banks are beginning to realise that they need more clarity about precisely how this data flows through the complex matrix of the financial system.
As a critical strategic industry, for finance to work ‘safely’ it would surely be wise to follow the lead of established process industries like Oil & Gas. That is, to understand precisely how its product flows and interacts with people, process and technology. In other words, to understand how data flows through the business. (In Oil & Gas digital sensors are attached to every asset, and digital flows, representing product flows, are clearly understood.)
In business generally there are no standards for flows of data. And that is one of the main explanations for the problems in finance, and it also explains why so many public/private IT projects fail.
In the past, architects, engineers and scientists have spent decades creating standards and practices so that, flows of water; steam; electricity; oil, petrol and components could be used safely. How a business worked was clearly understood.
But today banks, and companies in most other sectors, cannot see clearly the interdependencies between the individual business assets that enable the flow of data.
To answer your call to action, my colleagues and I have worked for almost ten years finalising the solution to the problem of understanding data flows.
It is called ‘The OBASHI Methodology’ and it has recently been published by The Stationery Office.
OBASHI creates clarity about a business works in any sector.
It will help stakeholders understand how IT acts as the cornerstone for the 21st century banking system.
Posted by: Paul Wallis 29 Sep 2010