25 Nov 2008
With global financial markets in meltdown, it is easy for business leaders to become blasé about other potential disasters: when it already seems that the sky is falling in, what else is there to worry about?
Less panic-stricken leaders, however, recognise the value in contingency planning. After all, in the face of massive uncertainty, it is the ability to successfully mitigate foreseeable misfortunes that will allow most businesses to flourish.
And despite the continuing economic chaos, organisations are surviving and many are ready to take a closer look at their own operations. For any business to carry on in the face of threats - whether terrorist, economic, environmental or acts of God - business continuity is an imperative.
A worrying fact, revealed in the latest annual report published by the Chartered Management Institute and supported by the Cabinet Office and the Continuity Forum, is that only 47 per cent of UK organisations have a business continuity plan a figure that has only increased by two percentage points in the past six years. Most companies in the UK are still ill prepared to cope with a disaster and are failing to prioritise business continuity planning.
However, Maxine Holt, senior research analyst at Butler Group, believes that large enterprises are taking business continuity more seriously than they are given credit for.
“The ones struggling are typically the mid-sized organisations, where there are other things higher up the priority list. Most of their time is spent fire fighting, so being proactive with disaster recovery and business continuity is not going to be top of their list,” she says.
Business continuity is not solely about disaster recovery - the technological aspects of getting systems up and running again - but also about how and where the business will continue to operate. Recent events such as the Buncefield oil terminal fire and the serious flooding across the UK last year have highlighted the need for businesses to develop extensive and long-term contingency plans, including partial or total relocation, in the event of a crisis.
Most commonly, the event that triggers the implementation of the business continuity plan is not a major disaster but a less serious event such as a local power failure. Therefore business continuity needs to include arrangements for short intervals of unplanned downtime as well as longer periods of disruption.
“It does not have to be a big disaster to require a business continuity strategy,” says Holt. “Systems outages of just a few hours can have a major impact on the ability of the business to continue its day-to-day operations.”
According to the British Standards Institution (BSI), there is a growing willingness from business leaders to engage with the concepts of business continuity. It reports that its new business continuity standard, BS25999, has achieved the fastest uptake ever. Launched in November 2007, BS25999 establishes the processes, principles and terminology of business continuity management. The standard specifies requirements for a documented business continuity management system within the context of managing an organisation’s overall business risk.
Andrew Morris, management systems director at the BSI, says that good business continuity processes should be combined with good risk management, to feed management information to decision makers to support good governance. “Business continuity is a main board issue and the responsibility of the chairman down,” he says. “However, it does not come free and that is why business impact planning will help to justify the costs. If something really matters to the business then it should make the resources available.”
Growing risk awareness and an increasingly dangerous business environment may have prompted more companies to invest in business continuity programs - but what is the practical experience behind the plans?
Few organisations have any real insight into the true extent of their IT assets as records are often incomplete or inaccurate. Not only does this challenge the validity of the business continuity solution but it also raises huge questions in the event of an insurance claim.
For most companies, one of the major issues is the complete lack of co-ordination between the asset register recorded within finance and the inventory lists used within the IT department to determine system maintenance and support.
Any inconsistency between the asset register held within finance and other inventory records in the business will raise significant doubt for insurance companies, delaying payment at best. At worst an organisation could lose any chance of an insurance pay-out, even face charges of claiming for non existent items.
There are simple processes that can be followed to ensure greater information consistency. A central repository that records the serial number and asset location, as well as the value of each item, will meet the needs of all departments from finance to IT.
Critically, this ensures that reliable, accurate information is available for both insurance and business continuity planning, reducing business risk whilst also giving companies more confidence in their business continuity investments.
Yours sincerely
Karen Conneely
Group Commercial Manager
Real Asset Management
www.realassetmgt.co.uk
Posted by: Karen Conneely 26 Nov 2008
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Networks
Latest videos
You may also like
Networks jobs
Will Facebook be able to continue its success as a public company?
Rubbish in... rubbish enterprise. Why proper data management is so important (video, 6 min)
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Upcoming Events
The implementation of robust, relevant digital strategies is more crucial than ever to the success of insurance businesses
Date: 01 Mar 2012
Time: 09:00am
A showcase of the latest in the information content and management
Date: 20 Mar 2012
Time: 09:00am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?