IT leaders blind to carbon legislation

By Andrew Charlesworth

17 Aug 2010

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Computer servers

Awareness of the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) energy efficiency scheme among IT leaders is near zero according to datacentre power efficiency specialists, despite the looming registration deadline and threat of large fines for companies that fail to comply.

The CRC became law this April and the deadline for registration is 30 September.

Further reading

The legislation applies to all organisations – private and public sector – that consume over 6,000MWh of electricity a year (equivalent to an annual bill of around £500,000) and are not included in the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). Companies with large in-house datacentres and extensive PC estates are likely to fall into this category.

Any applicable business that misses the deadline faces an initial £5,000 fine and a daily charge of £500 until registered up to a maximum of £45,000.

Only about a quarter of the 15,000 UK organisations likely to be included in the scheme have registered with the Department of the Environment so far, resulting in calls from energy minister Greg Barker for businesses to register now.

If business in general is being slow to wake up to the CRC, chief information officers are still sound asleep, according to anecdotal evidence from consultancies, analysts and energy companies, despite the fact that the power consumption of IT systems has become a hot topic over the last five years.

Tony Fisher, managing director of consultancy Greenocity, said: "This lack of IT awareness is shocking. Organisations will miss vital opportunities to reduce their energy bills and CO2 emissions."

Technologies such as datacentre virtualisation and consolidation, PC estate power management and cloud computing are all touted for their energy efficiency benefits. The aim of the CRC is to take emission reduction beyond a nice-to-have and make it a legal requirement for large organisations that fall outside the EU ETS.

Allowances granted under the CRC mean there is much to be gained financially from taking the scheme seriously. PricewaterhouseCoopers found poor performing businesses with energy bills of £1m could pay costs of up to £500,000 over five years. However, business with the same-sized bill could reduce its energy costs by 8 per cent equating to £85,000 in savings in a year, and £150,000 over five years.

Furthermore, there is considerable reputational advantage to be gained from the scheme: as of next year, league tables will be published based on the emission reduction performance of registered organisations.

Reader comments

Why have so few companies failed to sign up so far?

Electricity is the biggest single operating cost for any colocation data centre or in-house data centre, so every company is keeping a keen eye on the costs of electricity. So why have so few companies failed to register so far?

Perhaps the answer lies in the way the calculation is done to set the 6GWh per annum threshold? The calculation is across the whole of an organisation, including all subsidiaries. An independent colocation data centre has only one or a small number of sites to worry about, each of which creates a large and very visible invoice from the electricity utility company each month. So the data centre industry is very aware of its costs. But, a company which operates, say, a thousand chemist shops and factories across the UK has exactly the same problem, but spread across many thousands of bills, all of which may be aggregated and negotiated centrally, but which may alternatively be negotiated, accounted and paid at local level. Some may be on half-hourly meters, others not. Head office may not even be aware which bills, when added up, exceed the registration threshold.

So, it clearly isn't the data centre or colocation industry that is likely to make up the list of companies that should have registered but haven't. It's all the sprawling big corporates without decent financial controls, who are confidently sitting there thinking it has nothing to do with them. When the EA points out to them that it really has, along with a nasty fine, they may discover they need to do something about it quickly.

Posted by: Roger Keenan, City Lifeline  18 Aug 2010

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %