17 Jan 2008
Microsoft’s planned acquisition of enterprise search engine specialist Fast Search and Transfer (Fast) could prompt further consolidation in a shrinking range of corporate search tools, according to experts.
The software giant will integrate Fast technology into its Office SharePoint Server product when the estimated $1.2bn (£600m) deal closes, expected in the second quarter of 2008.
The supplier will need to combine various pieces of Fast code added through acquisitions and open source adoption including Linux cluster technology into SharePoint, as well as taking on up to 3,500 Fast customers.
Microsoft’s enormous size will be central to the success of the takeover, according to Ovum analyst Mike Davies.
“Fast has had some difficulties in the past few years, with misreporting and things, so only an organisation such as Microsoft could take any financial nasties that may come out further down the line,” he said.
Microsoft is not the only major supplier in the enterprise search market significant rivals include Google, Autonomy, IBM and Oracle.
And market leader Autonomy with an estimated 17,000 customers worldwide looks a prime acquisition prospect for vendors such as Oracle and HP with which it already has strategic partnerships.
The implications of market consolidation for users remain to be seen.
“Larger customers like consolidation because they do not like multiple contracts, but if you do not have anything outside the big suppliers then innovation may be stifled,” said Davies.
We'll probably see other acquisitions because all big players are afraid to miss the "next big search thing." In most cases, though, they'll be buying technology based on the same principle - keyword recognition.
Yes, you can add arcane semantic or linguistic algorithms, yes you can invest in taxonomies, but you will still have to give a system an exact definition.
But what if the keyword is misspelled? Will the engine work in this case? Or if you do not know exactly what you are looking for, just have a vague notion?
There are other solutions out there that deal with this problem by imitating the work of human brain (we don't look for keywords, we look for patterns). For example, Brainware possesses a unique, patent-protected technology that sets it apart from other data capture and enterprise search solutions providers.
Its products are powered by the world's only engine that does not rely on exact definitions to rapidly sift through mountains of unstructured data. Brainware's technology allows it to recognize and find data through inexact definitions, patterns and context, mimicking the way the human brain processes and sorts information.
No need for dictionaries that list most common misspellings, no need for inverted indexes, Boolean operators, and taxonomies. Just type in a stream of misspelled consciousness, and the system will find the match.
Such queries will make other search engines go catatonic with confusion, but Brainware just loves them.
Here's a case study showing Brainware in action:
Fulbright & Jaworski: Leading Law Firm Searches And Shares Knowledge Base Smarter, More Accurately
www.brainware.com/brain_case_lawfirm.php
Posted by: Yegor Kuznetsov 17 Jan 2008
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Applications
Latest videos
You may also like
Applications jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?