Government aims to bridge digital divide

17 Jan 2008

Comments: 2

A Computing logo
Picture of Park Hill flats, Sheffield
Reaching the least well-off is proving difficult for the government, which plans to gove internet access to the UK's most deprived areas

The government is to spend £30m over the next three years to bring broadband access to schoolchildren and low-income families.

A further £600,000 has also been earmarked to subsidise home computers for entire year groups at 50 education institutions across the country, schools minister Jim Knight told an education conference last week.

The plan is the government’s latest attempt to bridge the digital divide between those with access to technology and those without.

The government has already invested £5bn in IT for schools since 1997 and another £837m is budgeted over the next three years, according to Knight.

“We have the highest levels of embedded technology in classrooms in the European Union (EU) and one computer for every three pupils,” he said.

“The next step is home access for all ­ we have to find a way to make access universal, or it is not fair.”

The ubiquitous use of computers and the internet are crucial to avoid reinforcing social and academic divisions. There is also a significant economic implication. Digital inclusion could be worth as much as £60bn to the EU economy over the next five years, according to the European Commission.

In the UK, 71 per cent of households have internet access and 53 per cent have broadband. But reaching the least well-off is disproportionately difficult.

The government’s plans are a step in the right direction but there is no easy answer, according to Association for Learning Technology (ALT) chief executive Seb Schmoller.

“Internet access in a developed economy must be a citizen’s entitlement, like getting a drink of mains water,” said Schmoller. “The challenge for the government is to bring it about.”

The main issue will concern connectivity.

“Remote areas are still out of reach of broadband, and connection costs remain stubbornly high,” said Schmoller.

“Poorer households often have no fixed line, nor the credit rating to obtain one, even if they can afford to pay.”

Alongside direct government subsidy, the competitive broadband market will target even the poorest homes, said Matt Yardley, principal consultant at telecoms researcher Analysys.

“If operators see an opportunity to tap unaddressed demand, perhaps through a lower cost offer with more constraints, they will go for it,” said Yardley.

“And those homes where people are avoiding line rental charges could well be targeted by mobile companies.”

Focusing on young people will also help, said Ovum analyst Mike Philpott.

“The number of broadband subscribers has grown rapidly, but the government recognises that the market will only drive uptake to a certain level,” he said.

“Getting kids online early means they will never go back, and they can also be used as an educational tool by teaching their parents.”

The 2008 ALT conference will discuss the digital divide in September.

Hear podcast on this story http://computing.co.uk/podcasts

IT for schoolchildren

* The government has invested £5bn in schools IT since 1997

* Another £837m is budgeted over the next three years

* Some £30m is now available for home broadband access for schoolchildren

* Ubiquitous high-speed internet access could be worth £60bn to the EU economy over five years

Reader comments

Another Bonkers Initiative

I can't afford a computer for my kids but I can afford the latest trainers, 20 fags a day, £20 per week on pay mobile and an xbox. If the area is that deprived how long will it be b4 the thing is nicked/smashed/lost/damaged. It is not the cost of the computer, laptops are about £200 and going down in price all the time it is the huge phone bill they will run up if they get a phone line in. That is what community centres, libraries etc are for. What a bunch of money wasting morons govts are. Still plenty more money where that came from. Tax the workers and let the indigent play on their free computer.

Posted by: B Green  02 Mar 2008

Government obsession with providing computers for kids.

I really don't understand the government's obsession with providing access to computers to kids. I don't think spending money to provide 'the highest levels of embedded technology in classrooms in the EU' has improved the education of our children, as recent figures on school achievement have shown. Also why should low-income families expect to have high speed broadband and computers in their home for free. According to Jim Knight its not fair if they don't. Well it's not fair for them to live on baked beans and not have a car. Is Jim Knight going to provide those things also? Has he not heard of free computing in schools and libraries?

Posted by: M Spencer  23 Jan 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Have similar articles delivered to your inbox:

Will Facebook be able to continue its success as a public company?

Facebook has filed for an initial public offering (IPO) that plans to raise $5bn worth of shares on the US stock market, making it the biggest tech IPO ever. Will Facebook be able to continue its success as a public company?

73 %

1 %

7 %

19 %

0 %