US rules will affect your data

27 Sep 2007

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Picture of CIO Connect MD Nick Kirkland
Kirkland: US laws are affecting UK CIOs

Yet another aspect of compliance is about to loom large on the chief information officer (CIO) agenda.

Recent changes to Federal rules of civil procedure governing lawsuits in the US will have big implications for UK CIOs who also operate Stateside.

Further reading

The procedure raises questions about how an organisation handles electronic evidence and ­ alongside other legislation ­ requires companies to be able to locate relevant information wherever it is stored.

Software that is used to automate the so-called e-discovery process is starting to arrive on the market.

Eventually CIOs will be able to look to a single system capable of automating the whole spectrum of consolidated archiving, analytics and real-time policy management.

E-discovery software could best be described as being a linguistics engine with specialist tools that analyse words and the construction of phrases and sentences in stored, unstructured text files.

Such applications are fronted by a deliberately simple user interface, so that any business user could carry out searches in natural language. E-discovery software is ultimately capable of searching and discovering information held, not only in documents and applications, but in voice and video records as well.

Regulatory and judicial bodies recognise the area is enormously complex. The unique characteristics of electronic data, compared with paper records, present unprecedented challenges for the CIO.

But start to examine electronic information and records management from the three different perspectives of legal, records management and IT, and it quickly becomes clear that software tools are only part of the issue.

Obligations of the litigation process ­ such as the duty to preserve information that is, or may become, discoverable ­ differ greatly from the operational needs of data storage, where data deletion and destruction is a real and acceptable stage in the information lifecycle.

The Sedona Guidelines, Best Practice and Commentary for Managing Information and Records in the Electronic Age, is a good starting point for anyone wanting to familiarise themselves with the extent of the problem.

CIOs will require a practical, flexible and scalable approach to address the differences in an organisation’s business needs, its operations, the IT infrastructure and emerging regulatory and legal responsibilities.

For some, such an approach could favour a centralised function for compliance, while others may opt to delegate significant responsibilities to individual employees, before turning on automation to identify and maintain records.

But for now it is clear that no single standard or model will fully meet an organisation’s information and records management policies and procedures.

Nick Kirkland is managing director of CIO Connect, a leading forum for chief information officers and chief executives

Reader comments

Beware of Simple Solutions

You predict the advent of simpler tools for e-discovery. Certainly, we need them, if only to bring attorneys back in touch with the evidence, and indeed better tools will emerge. But, we must be wary of tools that focus exclusively on text, appreciating that text is only part of the evidentiary picture.

A tool geared to text alone misses increasingly important evidence such as voice mail, IM in cryptic shorthand, video, graphical representations of text and much metadata (some of which may exist only as a bit flag in an application). Moreover, the most important textual files don't store their contents as text. The search tool must be capable of seeing inside these multifarious encrypted, compressed or proprietary formats to pick up the text. Word, PDF and Outlook may account for most of what we seek, but certainly not all.

There can be no doubt that text is most important and will remain so for some time. A tool that does a good job on text is essential, but let's be careful we don't equate "essential" with "sufficient."

Thanks for the fine piece.

Posted by: Craig Ball, Austin, Texas  27 Sep 2007

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Will Google’s new privacy policy impact how you use its services?

Google recently said will consolidate more than 60 of its privacy policies into one, unifying customer data across most of its products. The announcement has met with a backlash in the US, while EU officials have asked Google to put its plans on hold so it can assess the privacy impact for users. Will you consider not using Google in the future as a result?

63 %

13 %

2 %

22 %