The key to a successful project

06 Mar 2008

Comment: 1

A Computing logo
Picture of an IT manager
IT managers need to define success

So many technology projects fail to deliver the required business benefits. Often it seems as if all the elements of the project have delivered, but the expected business benefits have not been realised.

Technology projects can fail as a result of mistakes made before, during or after the implementation phase of the project lifecycle. Organisations, therefore, need to rethink their strategies in order to set projects on the road to success.

First, IT managers need to define what success is for the project and how it will be measured.

At the outset, success is often determined by a return on investment figure, combined with a number of qualitative factors, such as flexibility and speed to respond to change.

As projects progress, such factors often change to focus on a single measure ­ such as launching the system by a certain date ­ and the original rationale is forgotten as workers becomes fixated on one particular date or deadline.

Business-led projects start with people: leaders have goals for the business; operational teams have a need to be smarter, quicker and cheaper; and marketing teams want a faster time to market for their products and offers.

IT managers really need to think about the needs of such stakeholders and how their requirements will be translated into project delivery. For example, have the trade-offs between stated goals been agreed and any conflicts addressed?

Without clarity, the project will veer in different directions as individuals focus on their own agendas.

Success has to be about implementing a business solution, rather than a technology solution.

Projects must be business- and people-led, not technology-led. Technology is one, often significant, element, but it is certainly not the most critical factor.

IT managers should start with what the business is trying to achieve and then figure out what the most appropriate solution might look like across process, technology, organisation and users.

It is important to recognise that technology projects often lose sight of the people who will be on the receiving end of the efforts ­the users.

And it is, therefore, vital to understand and manage the expectations of users by involving them at an early stage.

Without early engagement and effective communication, the wrong solution could be built ­ and automating poor processes simply results in increased failure.

To minimise the impact of problems remaining undiscovered until a late stage, embrace the discovery of risks, and focus the project team and end users on resolution, not blame.

Also, create the right environment for success, such as creating strong relationships between stakeholders and the right information flow within projects.

If you encounter problems, tackle them head on; do not brush issues under the carpet or put them on the back burner for too long.

Project success is not about blame; it is about facing up to reality. A mature,well thought-out approach will save the business time and money.

Hugh Buckley is managing director at business change experts Quortex

Reader comments

All very well, but...

While it's about time it was acknowledged that it is the people, rather than the methodologies that will determine whether or not your business project will be a triumph, Hugh Buckley neglects to mention the processes after project completion.

Granted, while the project is in development stages, it needs both a talented team leader and a team with a strong and varied mix of key skills with excellent communication throughout. However, the most crucial aspect when ensuring a successful project is to maintain this provision of project-based leadership skills beyond the completion of the project.

Too many organisations break up the team, disband the project board and bid farewell to third party suppliers on project completion. This is no way to ensure that their investment has been fully realised and goals achieved.

As quite a lot of project managers are now incentivised on project delivery rather than project deliverables, it is no surprise that once the project has been completed, individuals immediately refocus attention on the next challenge. This must change. Successful deployment is just the first step - strong leadership, rather than methodology, is the lynchpin to achieving the expected financial and efficiency benefits requires on-going focus on process change to exploit the new technology. Otherwise, a seemingly successfully completed project can fail.

Posted by: Rick Firth, Managing Director, Parity  13 Mar 2008

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

87 %

5 %

8 %