14 Oct 2009
The Technology Strategy Board (TSB) is to trial applications over next generation optical fibre to test whether consumers and businesses would use the extra bandwidth provided by the technology.
The board is looking to find out whether residential customers would make use of the sort of services that a high bandwidth network would enable.
Further reading
BT and other ISPs fear that their expensive build out of network infrastructure will be underutilised and fail to generate sufficient revenue to justify the upfront capital costs.
BT has said that the commercial case for a full rollout is questionable, even in areas of high density. However, its recent commitment to deploy a variant of fibre-to-the-home (FTTH), called fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP), gets around the problem.
FTTP would allow BT to offset high infrastructure investment by spreading the costs over a significant number of users – for example residential customers in blocks of flats, or business users situated in the same business park.
TSB electronics and photonics lead technologist Nick Appleyard said: “We are looking to build confidence that new products and services will work over this infrastructure, and you can only really test this by putting the technology in front of real customers."
Appleyard explained that this was not a trial for network hardware, but one that would look at the layer above that – the application and services layer.
"The services we will look at will be aimed at individual and [small] business users. Potentially, they could also be extended into mobile phone-delivered services, too."
Appleyard pointed out that the TSB was not a policy body and could only act within the government's policy remit.
"What we can do, however, is help to encourage private sector investment by demonstrating that the private sector will see a return on investment. We also want to show what that return is likely to be," he said.
Appleyard envisages two or three locations for the service rollouts, which he said will have to be on a big enough scale to get statistically significant data.
"What the TSB will be looking for is a ready-made community that we can upgrade with five years’ worth of internet development," said Appleyard.
The TSB system will be on an "opt-in if you want it – opt-out if you don't basis". Users will get services five years ahead of the game, while ISPs will get an understanding of how their services will work.
"They’ll be able to collect data on what the user groups think of their services," said Appleyard.
As for a start date, Appleyard said: "We'll tender the programme for IT procurement in about a week's time. We need to liaise with the firms who are going to build the IT core of this further down the line. We plan to go live mid 2010."
totally agree with Nicholas's previous comment. the only thing that will save the UK is for the govt to get IT. They need to try joined up thinking. It reminds me of the Python sketch when a person is trying to report a burglary and none of the policemen can take the story... (jfgi).
The department for innovation can't help, cos they do policy. The dept of funny walks can't help cos they do something else. If they all worked together they could make this country really rock. But no, they don't get it and I am now left wondering if they ever will.
JOIN the dots gentlemen. Or we will never be able to compete in the global economy if we continue to milk an obsolete copper infrastructure.
Posted by: cyberdoyle 18 Oct 2009
BT has consitently refused to invest any of its massive profits in the past in the infrastructure of the network. As a result the UK ranks just above Malaysia in the broadband world.
The only reason the government privitised the utilities in the UK was the ageing pipes and wires and the cost of replacement. No private company was going to invest this amount of money either and that has been proven. More water leaks from Thames' pipes than the new desalination plant was going create. The same is true of BT. Increasing the bandwidth is going to cost so much now because nothing has been replaced before. Fibre is now to be paid for by a Government Broadband Tax of £6 per telephone line come Christmas. Yet another private company is rescued from costs it should have absorbed when it was paying fantastic returns to its shareholders and board.
When will we learn?
If the country is to benefit in the long term then it is the Government that must enforce the investments that private companies could but won't make. That is the price that BT should have paid for its licence to print money monopoly granted by the state.
Posted by: Nicholas M. Kulkarni. Dip.Comp(open). MInstLM 15 Oct 2009
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Services and Outsourcing
Latest videos
You may also like
Services and Outsourcing jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?