The abolition of Soca and the NPIA to make way for a new policing body, the National Crime Agency, has caused waves in the forces but what does it say about the Home Office’s approach to IT and policing?
On the strength of a white paper, entitled Policing in the 21st Century: reconnecting police and the people, the Home Office appears to have a two-pronged approach.
The establishment of the National Crime Agency puts emphasis on better data co-ordination and centralisation leading to enhanced policing on a national level.
However, on a local level, the government has said it wants to focus on “accountability and not technology,” which will see it leave the rollout of specific technology to the police forces themselves.
Centralised IT tools
But it seems that many at the more senior level in the police say the
government’s moves are misguided and argue that the abolition of Soca and NPIA
will create problems around information management, because it will mean further
transfer of systems and loss of staff knowledge.
Philip Webb, former chief of the Police IT Association, which was also disbanded, and current chair of the BCS government relations group, said the abolition of the NPIA and Soca has meant “things are pretty much in turmoil”.
“There is a lot of IT expertise within police forces but there is a lack of co-ordination and this [disbanding of central bodies] compounds the issue,” he said.
However, he said there had been many moves towards greater co-ordination over the past 10 years, with initiatives such as the national radio system, fingerprint system and the DNA database being rolled out.
The market is also rising to the challenge of providing services that can be used to co-ordinate information, with a shared services platform from Steria being taken up by Cleveland police force. It allows forces to share services such as payroll, commissioning and fleet management and could be rolled out to all 53 UK police forces.
The uptake of technology at local level has tended to be slow. One reason cited has been a reluctance to change from the average police officer. The Home Office report showed that seven police forces have opted not to arm officers with any sort of mobile device. However, Mark Cleverley, director of strategy at IBM’s Global Government Industry division, insists that officers’ use of IT is not a huge stumbling block for introducing more advanced technology.
“You have to look at the roles people play across the spectrum. Your ordinary copper is probably not going to become an expert on how to use IBM software or any sort of analytical software. But then that’s not their job,” he said.
He added that instead, they will use technology that enables them to provide data more efficiently. This information can be analysed and lead to better decision making.
“It enables enlightened decisions about resourcing, pre-placement of assets, shift patterns – the kind of decisions that are made all the time, but hopefully they will be better informed by the fact-based insight that comes out of these systems,” he said.
BCS’s Webb argues that IT implementations in local police forces tend to be good because they follow the model of the military and provide tools to officers that are easy to use. He added that the way to get police officers using new technology is by including them in the consultation.
“You have to introduce technology to police officers in a way that makes them feel part of it. They need to see the benefits of the technology,” he said.
Technology implementation
IBM is attempting to appeal to UK police forces with its predictive analytics tools, which enable them to anticipate crime hot spots by inputting historical information about crime.
In the US, the Memphis Police Department (MPD) has used IBM’s predictive analytics software for its own Criminal Reduction Utilizing Statistical History system, and can now evaluate patterns and forecast criminal activity to proactively allocate resources and deploy personnel.
The MPD says the system has helped to reduce serious crime by more than 30 per cent, including a 15 per cent reduction in violent crimes since 2006. Now, two unnamed UK police forces are using IBM’s technology in an effort to make a similar impact on crime in their areas.
Bloggers who think that the abolition of the NPIA will save the taxpayer £500 million a year are very mistaken as much of the NPIA budget is taken up with paying for critical national services such as Airwave (national police radio system) and these services still have to be paid for unless your bloggers would have the police revert to yoghurt cartons and strings
Posted by: J 24 Sep 2010
Having recently left the police in a senior management role in IT, I could find very little value that the NPIA added to the police service in terms of IT systems. The prescribed NSPIS systems from the NPIA have now been all but ditched by the majority of forces, hence they are trying again with a new programme called ISIS. This over-simplified approach assumes the companies a) are able to cope with supporting every police force running their systems, b) their IT systems can scale up without significant investment and c) police forces aren't already putting in their own in-house written systems, collaborating directly with their regional forces.
I have no political axe to grind with the NPIA, but the prescribed systems approach is totally out-dated, and as a previous comment stated there are a significant number of professional IT directors who are more than capable of delivering real cost savings.
Posted by: a 08 Aug 2010
I see that the teenage hacks from the Tory Central Office and the Taxpayers Alliance have been busy sending the usual poisoned comments. I know from personal experience of over 30 years in the IT business that the NPIA saved the UK an awful lot of money and I regret its abolition which is a retrograde step by a naive government run by cost-cutting jesuits big on ideas but short on grey matter.
Posted by: Alfred Dadley 06 Aug 2010
the NPIA were a complete waste of money; you have at least 43 professional IT directors wanting better integration with systems and each others forces, and implement quality software, but are pushed into using useless software by the NPIA, it's no wonder the police service appears to be a slow adopter. Goodbye, you won't be missed...
Posted by: a 04 Aug 2010
(NPIA), which didn't exist until three years ago and costs the taxpayer more than £500 million a year - that's over £1.5 billion of taxpayer money since its inception. Its reason for being? To 'help to improve the way policing works'. For the NPIA this means doing things like 'improving the delivery of services' and 'developing skills and professionalism in the workplace' - not actually investigating any crime, God forbid.
Crikey, what did we do before the NPIA? I mean, if there aren't enough people to achieve that goal in the Home Office, all 55 UK police forces, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary, the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Association of Police Authorities, the Police Advisory Board for England and Wales, the Chief Police Officers' Staff Association, or the Police Superintendents Association... then surely it's a lost cause.
Posted by: Nat B 03 Aug 2010
Have your say on this article
Newsletters
Latest stories from Public Sector
Latest videos
You may also like
Public Sector jobs
Technology Patent Wars
Case studies from large organisations across all sectors
... And rich media, and flexible working, and peaks in traffic ...
Upcoming Events
Join us for this Computing web seminar, in which the Head of BI at the Co-operative Group Nick Colebourn will be explaining just how he reigned in the Group’s sprawling database estate and how significant savings were realised and data quality improved as a result.
Date: 31 May 2012
Time: 11:00 AM
Live June 13th 11:00am: Register now. During this web seminar we will be looking at the sorts of incidents that can bring data centres grinding to a halt and what can be done about them.
Date: 13 Jun 2012
Time: 11:00 am
Receive the latest jobs direct to your inbox
Are you being paid what you are worth?