Multi-sourcing hampers efficiency, study warns

29 Apr 2009

Comments: 2

A Computing logo
meeting
Multi-sourcing can stall efficiency, according to PA Consulting

New research by PA Consulting warns that the growing trend for corporates to outsource work to multiple service providers can have a number of pitfalls.

The survey – which polled more than 100 respondents including end-users, service providers and lawyers of large firms in the UK, US, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany – suggests that attempts to spread risk and cut costs by awarding work to various suppliers can lead to integration problems and hinder innovation.

According to PA, there is a strong trend towards multi-source outsourcing contracts, with almost three-quarters of businesses polled intending to move in that direction. However, PA warns that many of these businesses lack the necessary in-house resources to manage multiple outsourcing relationships, with only 16 per cent of the respondents saying they have a mature governance model for outsourced agreements.

“If organisations cannot effectively manage a single supplier, there are very real questions to be asked about their ability to define multiple distinct contracts and manage integration between suppliers,” said the report.

Increasing pressure to keep spending down is also taking its toll on innovation. PA said that “unfeasibly tight” procurement and implementation deadlines meant that only a third of the outsourcing deals covered by its survey were delivering some kind of IT innovation.

“Service providers are increasingly pushing innovation as a differentiator in this market, but these organisations are not explicit in how that innovation will translate into the customer’s business situation,” said the PA report.

“However, the lack of innovation realisation is not entirely the fault of the provider – there is a clear disconnect between customer and supplier objectives that is causing problems. Many organisations are very unclear about what is meant by innovation,” it said.

The collapse of Indian IT services company Satyam earlier this year provided greater impetus for firms to explore multi-sourcing. In the wake of the scandal, Deloitte consultant Neville Howard advised IT decision-makers to take an extra careful and measured approach to outsourcing and reassess the extent to which their companies put all their eggs in one basket.

The ideal approach, he said, was to take a multivendor approach and spread risk across more than two suppliers, as well as demanding very strict framework contracts.

“Because of the latest developments in the market, restructuring contracts will be on CIOs’ minds, which is not a bad thing after all – it is more like a wake-up call to risks involved in that sort of relationship,” he told Computing in January.

Reader comments

Multisourcing: Don't put all your eggs in the same basket

Multisourcing is defined as outsourcing of processes or sub-processes to two or more parties. Multisourcing has something common with investing: The rule "Don't put all your eggs in the same basket" holds true for both. It allows to avoid risks connected with dependence on one party and/or one geographical region

Just a few headlines in brief:

India: National Association of Software Services Companies (Nasscom) forecasts that the Indian outsourcing industry can potentially earn revenue of $225 billion by 2020 in a conservative variant or even $375 billion in an optimistic scenario.

China: According to the statistics provided by the second China International Service Outsourcing Cooperation Conference, in the first five months of 2009 the number of newly-established outsourcing companies in China stood at 1,057, bringing 246,000 new jobs and generating a profit of $3.52 billion, which is a 13.2 percent increase year-on-year.

Ready to read more? Just jump here:
Multisourcing: Don't put all your eggs in the same basket
We Are the Second, Third, Fourth -- We Try Harder!

Magdalena Szarafin
http://www.szarafin.info

Posted by: Magdalena Szarafin  24 Jul 2009

Business need must drive innovation

Picking up on the point:

"However, the lack of innovation realisation is not entirely the fault of the provider ? There is a clear disconnect between customer and supplier objectives that is causing problems. Many organisations are very unclear about what is meant by innovation."

In reality, the problem often goes deeper than that. In many cases, there's a disconnect between the needs of the business and the IT service being provided. Outsourcing only moves the underlying problem somewhere else.

The challenge is always to get the business and the IT functions talking clearly about what's needed and what's possible. When that's totally clear, then the field is open to determine the direction 'innovation' needs to take - the 'what' rather than the 'how'.

Expecting an outside organisation (in this case an outsourcer) to understand the business need is an almost impossible challenge.

It's an area we've worked with many clients to help them clarify BEFORE they start an outsourcing procurement process.

Posted by: Mike McCormac  30 Apr 2009

Have your say on this article

All fields required. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Sign up for our FREE newsletters

Technology Patent Wars

Large companies such as Microsoft, Facebook and Google have been hoovering up technology patents recently. Is this stifling innovation?

88 %

5 %

7 %