A valuable proposition

Businesses consider reliability, security and performance of a purchase above cost, which is where TVPs come in

Written by Bob Tarzey

Take a look at a lot of the sales material provided by IT vendors and you would think the only criterion used by businesses for buying products is cost, and that unless a return on investment (ROI) can be shown in a matter of months, customers will not be interested in a proposition, whatever it is.

Quocirca research shows that ROI is not the primary driver for most IT purchases, but that businesses consider a number of factors. These range from hard-edged financial objectives, such as revenue generation and cost reduction, to softer ones such as reliability and customer satisfaction.

Regardless of what material they are fed by vendors, resellers can differentiate themselves by aligning their own propositions more closely with the commercial aspirations of the businesses they are selling to.

The evidence is consistent. Even for purchases such as servers, businesses rate reliability, performance and security feature more highly than costs of acquisition and operation (see related charts, figure 1).

For a more glamorous purchase, such as a CRM application, customer satisfaction and retention rate more highly than direct financial drivers such as growing sales revenues and reducing operating costs (see figure 2).

So forget the ROI models that pop up in vendor presentations and collateral, and focus on what customers want: a total value proposition (TVP). There is a problem with this, however. TVP is harder to quantify than ROI.

This is not surprising, because TVP reflects the real value a business gets from a particular purchase, but it is a much better way of justifying IT investments.

TVP takes into account three categories of business benefit: the creation of business value, the reduction of business risk and the saving of business cost. For example, the implementation of a good CRM system creates business value by increasing customer retention.

Deploying it on a reliable server reduces business risk by ensuring the system does not crash. Over time, both will reduce business costs. The CRM system should lead to better customer retention, so less money needs to be spent on gaining new customers, and if the server is reliable, service costs are less.

But how can resellers usefully translate this for their own propositions? Take the proposition you are making and for each category of business benefit, and list the positive and negative aspects of implementing it.

A CRM system is expected to create business value by increasing customer retention, but there will be a negative impact as staff get used to using a new system. It will decrease business risk because information is less likely to get lost if it is stored in one place.

But putting all information in one place also creates a business risk: a single point of failure. It will cut business cost because customer communications will be more efficient, but it will create business cost because the new system will have to be paid for.

For each positive and negative item listed, consider its importance to the business and rate the impact on the business of not deploying the proposition. With the CRM example, it is important to retain customers and the impact of not doing so on the business is high.

Sure, there will be negative impact while staff are trained to use the new system, but this is only short-term. The value of having customer information stored in one central place will be high, leading to better communications and improved customer satisfaction.

The risk of having customer information all in one place is quite low; the danger of system failure can be mitigated cheaply with a good backup strategy.

Costs will be reduced by making customer communications more efficient. Making fewer and shorter telephone calls will save a bit, but not that much, and certainly not enough to pay for a good CRM system and its annual maintenance.

Only when all the business benefits have been taking into account can the full benefit to the business be seen and the investment justified, or in some cases not.

This is a simple example and for any proposition there will be many more business benefits to take into consideration than the few used here. But using TVP is worth it. It allows a realistic justification to be made for pricey IT investments based on the actual requirements of the business.

To see the illustrations associated with this report please click here.

Bob Tarzey is service director at Quocirca.

Quocirca (01753) 855 794
www.quocirca.com

Tags:

reader comments

related articles

CRM rises to the top

The technology which took a beating over the past few years is now regaining popularity, even among SMEs 09 Aug 2004

 

related whitepapers

today's top stories

What does Windows 7 mean for Microsoft?

With the sting of Vista still fresh, Redmond has to make next Windows work 10 Jul 2009

A smarter way to use BI

Getting the most from business intelligence systems requires not only careful management on the part of IT leaders, but also the committed involvement of decision-makers across the organisation 08 Jul 2009

The truth behind the Google/Microsoft/NHS rumours

Before Monday 6 July, did you know that Google and Microsoft had services for storing health records? Thanks to an article in... 10 Jul 2009

Quenching a thirst for IT modernisation

A substantial restructure at soft drink supplier Nichols -­ purveyor of Vimto - ­led the company to update its software to Sage 1000 to replace its in-house application. This resulted in the streamlining of the IT department and an opportunity to customise the system 08 Jul 2009

How Satyam cleaned up its act

Chief executive CP Gurnani tells Angelica Mari why Tech Mahindra opted to keep the Satyam brand after it bought the scandal-hit services firm, and explains what the deal means for existing and prospective customers 09 Jul 2009

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

More available - click 'submit' to view

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Advertisement

Jobs

Related jobs

Job of the week

Job alerts

Sign up here

Find your next job

IT Salary Checker

Check salary here

Advertisement

White papers

Search white papers

Top categories

VPN, Extranet and Intranet Solutions

WAN/ LAN Solutions

Network Security

Interoperability-Connectivity

Grid/ Utility Computing

Latest poll

Will Google Chrome OS be a genuine alternative to Windows?

Will Google Chrome OS be a genuine alternative to Windows?

Tell us your views on the new operating system rivalry

View poll results

Latest audio and video articles

network cablesVideo

How to maximise the value of your IT networking investment

A panel of experts discuss networking strategies that deliver real value to business 03 Jul 2009

green footprintsVideo

How to manage enterprise energy use - and the role IT can play

A panel of experts explore how firms can get to grips with their carbon footprint and make smarter use of energy 01 Jul 2009

Latest in-depth articles

Google ChromeAnalysis

Lack of enterprise appeal takes shine off Chrome OS

Enterprise buyers unlikely to ditch Windows for Chrome OS in the near term, say experts 09 Jul 2009

Satyam CEO CP GurnaniNews

How Satyam cleaned up its act

Chief executive CP Gurnani tells Angelica Mari why Tech Mahindra opted to keep the Satyam brand after it bought the scandal-hit services firm, and explains what the deal means for existing and prospective customers 09 Jul 2009

Advertisement

Primary Navigation