A farmer
The agency issues payments to farmers

Rural payments scheme still a "masterclass of misadministration"

NAO's third report into agency administering farm payments slams lack of progress and complexity of IT

Written by Tom Young

The National Audit Office (NAO) has slammed a government agency set up to administer payments to farmers under the EU Common Agricultural Policy as a " masterclass of misadministration" in one of its most damning reports ever.

The Rural Payments Agency has been beset by problems administering the Single Payment Scheme since 2005.

The NAO has already looked at the scheme twice and officials now feel so frustrated with progress that they have qualified the agency's accounts.

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said: "There has been a serious lack of attention to the protection of taxpayers' interests over the administration of the scheme. There has been a lack of senior management ownership of the scheme in the agency and Defra, even though the risks were previously highlighted by the Committee of Public Accounts."

Although farmers are now being paid on time, they are still being paid inaccurately. And the cost of the scheme is high and increasing – the average claim costs £1,743 to process, six times as much as it costs in Scotland.

The agency has incurred £680m worth of unforeseen additional costs since 2005, and faces further fines from the EU if its system fails.

Philip Gibby, NAO director of value for money for Defra, said the IT system has been a major part of the problem for the agency.

"They had to rush in far too complex a system in too tight a timeframe," he said.

The IT systems for the scheme alone have cost £350m and the main contractor Accenture has been paid £84m in the past two years, more than twice as much as the £36m originally forecast.

Many of the agency's IT contracts are due to end this year, though Accenture's will expire next year.

Because the system is so bespoke and complex, sticking with the current IT system would most likely mean sticking with those contractors.

But the NAO is recommending that the agency looks seriously at scrapping the system and implementing a new one, as costs of processing claims continue to spiral.

"They have to cost a new system," said Gibby.

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print this
  • Share

reader comments

related articles

Houses of ParliamentPublic Sector

MPs demand greater transparency for government IT projects

Public Accounts Committee demands publication of Gateway reviews 10 Sep 2009

 

More problems for rural payments

Millions have been overpaid - farmers fury over unclear repayment schedules 17 Jul 2008

Rural payments system still a problem

Farmers still receiving overpayments despite major IT investment 15 Jul 2008

Rural payments fiasco could cost £500m

The technology programme was a 'masterclass in failure', says the PAC 06 Sep 2007

MPs slam government in continuing rural payments row

Commons committee says response to its report is 'shoddy' 30 Jul 2007

Defra officials defend farm payments scheme to MPs

Public Accounts Committee is frustrated by lack of progress in paying farmers accurately, cost-effectively and on time 27 Oct 2009

Defra officials to be questioned on farm payments

MPs will question officials on failings outlined in a highly critical report by the National Audit Office 26 Oct 2009

Government reacts to NAO's report on the Rural Payment Agency

Report orders Defra to scrap and replace flawed IT system 17 Dec 2009

related whitepapers

today's top stories

Police hunt for moles with security software

Lancashire Constabulary to monitor data input of 7,000 staff in bid to prevent intelligence leaks 09 Feb 2010

PaperlinX outsources IT and comms to Bull and BT

Paper company spends €22m on five-year deal for desktop management, helpdesk and datacentre services 05 Feb 2010

Social tools take KM to a new level

Technology expert David Tebbutt explains how – and why – organisations should integrate social networking tools into their knowledge management strategy 02 Feb 2010

EDS court defeat puts vendors on their guard

BSkyB’s victory in a long-running court case against EDS has serious implications for the IT industry 02 Feb 2010

Law firm monitors web traffic violations

Bucks declining global security appliance sales with unified threat management (UTM) platform deployment 01 Feb 2010

Advertisement

Security: The New Face of Intrusion Prevention
An outline of traditional IPS functionality, modern developments and how IPS can be deployed easily.

UK businesses’ attitudes to Cloud Computing revealed

Features results from a survey of over 200 Computing readers.

Advertisement

Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies; ITHound.com brings you over 6,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

More available - click 'submit' to view

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Jobs

Related jobs

Job of the week

Job alerts

Sign up here

Find your next job

IT Salary Checker

Check salary here

Advertisement

Latest poll

Internet Explorer 6

Internet Explorer 6

Following recent concerns about the security of Internet Explorer 6 are you planning to phase it out?

View poll results

Latest audio and video articles

Tony McAlisterVideo

Video Q&A: Tony McAlister, CTO, Betfair - Part one

On changing the skills development strategy at the online gambling firm - part one of a two-part video interview 05 Nov 2009

Video

Nokia shows upcoming handset technologies

Mobile phone features of tomorrow take the stage 21 Oct 2009

Latest in-depth articles

Analysis

Police hunt for moles with security software

Lancashire Constabulary to monitor data input of 7,000 staff in bid to prevent intelligence leaks 09 Feb 2010

Businessman with eye patch, dagger and tie round head, sitting at laptopFeatures

Are you sure you're not a pirate?

It is alarmingly easy for an IT leader to unwittingly exceed the scope of a software licence, and the chances of being caught out have never been greater, as technology lawyers Mark Weston and Paul Gershlick explain 09 Feb 2010

Primary Navigation